Re: mutt users are too sheltered (was Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value)

2012-12-01 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Tony's unattended mail [12-01-12 05:43]: > On 2012-12-01, Rado Q wrote: > >=- Jamie Paul Griffin wrote on Sat 1.Dec'12 at 8:38:57 + -= > > > >> Long lines != the end of the world. Simple as that. > > > > ... _for you_. > > But it can mean the beginning of the end for efficient > > communi

Re: mutt users are too sheltered (was Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value)

2012-12-01 Thread David Champion
* On 01 Dec 2012, Tony's unattended mail wrote: > > Regardless of which standards a mutt user endorses, a good quality > tool is lenient in what it accepts, handles it well, while being > strict in what it produces. Yes, that's generally our principle. > Yet mutt is not good at handling common

Re: mutt users are too sheltered (was Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value)

2012-12-01 Thread Rado Q
=- Tony's unattended mail wrote on Sat 1.Dec'12 at 10:41:11 + -= > Jamie actually did this list a service. Overly sheltered mutt > users have a tendancy to lose touch. Jamie's post actually exposed > a mutt characteristic that can be improved. a) improving mutt is good: go ahead. b) this doe

mutt users are too sheltered (was Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value)

2012-12-01 Thread Tony's unattended mail
On 2012-12-01, Rado Q wrote: >=- Jamie Paul Griffin wrote on Sat 1.Dec'12 at 8:38:57 + -= > >> Long lines != the end of the world. Simple as that. > > ... _for you_. > But it can mean the beginning of the end for efficient > communication, when everybody starts caring less and less for it by