Hi, folks --
What priority or importance headers does mutt recognize? In fact, is
there any sort of flag for Urgent or Important mail? I just noticed that
a couple of hot emails that I sent looked just like any other when I went
into the Fcc: folder...
TIA & Happy Holidays!
:-D
--
David T-G
On 1999-12-23 19:44:31 -0500, David T-G wrote:
> What priority or importance headers does mutt recognize?
None.
However, with unstable, you could use some scoring rules to
automatically flag certain messages as important.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
Thomas, et al --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
% On 1999-12-23 19:44:31 -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% > What priority or importance headers does mutt recognize?
%
% None.
Hmmph...
%
% However, with unstable, you could use some scoring rules to
% automatically flag certain messages as im
On 1999-12-27 07:55:12 -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Hokay. Since I know nothing about scoring and haven't looked at
> the unstable branch, do you think that I could score messages
> based on a header (Priority: or Importance:) and then make that
> entry in the index be reverse color (since I just u
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was actually thinking about flagging messages as important (the
> "!" in the index).
That can also be done using procmail to modify the Status: header
according to the headers that it notices when the message is received.
--
David DeSimone | "T
Thomas, et al --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
% On 1999-12-27 07:55:12 -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% > based on a header (Priority: or Importance:) and then make that
% > entry in the index be reverse color (since I just use mono)? I
%
% I was actually thinking about flagging messages as
On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 06:14:28AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % What you are proposing can be done with the usual index coloring.
>
> Good. Off to the manual (unless anyone else out there wants to just
> show me how to do it :-)
>
> Actually, I think I need that help. I've tried playing around
David --
...and then David Shaw said...
% On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 06:14:28AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > header while I was reading the message. What I *want* is for the index
% > line of a flagged message to be reversed so that it stands out in the
% > display.
%
% Try
% mono index
Hi, all --
...and then David @ BigFoot said...
%
% Um, if it's not too much to ask, do you know if I can reverse based on an
% arbitrary header, like "Importance: High" or "Priority: Urgent" rather
% than having to have procmail insert the X-Status: header for me too?
I guess I can answer my ow
