On Fri, March 19, 2010 3:02 am, rog...@sdf.org wrote:
On 2010-03-18, peng shao shallp...@gmail.com wrote:
Folder hooks are processed as the manual says. However, the push
command pushes its arguments onto a stack and mutt's input parser
later pops those arguments off the stack to parse and
I recently found the following interesting phenomenon:
I included the following lines in my muttrc
mailboxes ~/.MuttMail/inbox
set spoolfile=~/.MuttMail/inbox
folder-hook . 'push :default'
folder-hook inbox 'push :inbox'
This is the only four lines in the muttrc because I want to do a clean
On 2010-03-18, peng shao shallp...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently found the following interesting phenomenon:
I included the following lines in my muttrc
mailboxes ~/.MuttMail/inbox
set spoolfile=~/.MuttMail/inbox
folder-hook . 'push :default'
folder-hook inbox 'push :inbox'
This is the
On 08:47 Thu 18 Mar , Gary Johnson wrote:
It's the way it's supposed to work, but it is confusing.
Folder hooks are processed as the manual says. However, the push
command pushes its arguments onto a stack and mutt's input parser
later pops those arguments off the stack to parse and
On 2010-03-18, peng shao shallp...@gmail.com wrote:
It's the way it's supposed to work, but it is confusing.
Folder hooks are processed as the manual says. However, the push
command pushes its arguments onto a stack and mutt's input parser
later pops those arguments off the stack to parse and
