On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 06:46:15PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 18:46:15 +0200
> From: Jesper Holmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: resend-message (esc e) not honouring $record
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* On Tue Oct 02, Ryan Cook wrote:
> What's wrong with the copy in the 'outgoing' folder? Why does it have
> to show up in your Inboxor I guess you want the message filed into
> a specific directory?
Eh...what? I get the impression you've misunderstood something I wrote.
I just want my outgo
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 06:20:54PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
> * On Tue Oct 02, pat wrote:
> > I'm new at this but,
> > ?? perhaps ?? cc yourself ??
>
> You're right, that is one solution to getting my own copy of what I send.
> But my problem was more specific: to automatically make mutt
* On Tue Oct 02, René Clerc wrote:
> macro index \ee "fsent_mail\n"
>
> does the trick for me.
This does indeed do the trick. I should have been able to find
that one out by myself, shouldn't I? *Blushing*
But I still think this workaround should not be needed.
Jesper
--
Jesper Ho
* On Tue Oct 02, pat wrote:
> I'm new at this but,
> ?? perhaps ?? cc yourself ??
You're right, that is one solution to getting my own copy of what I send.
But my problem was more specific: to automatically make mutt record the
fact that I've sent a new message, something it does in all cas
* Jesper Holmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-10-2001 13:38]:
| * On Mon Oct 01, Ben Reser wrote:
| > It's deliberate. Search the archives this discussion has been had
| > several times.
|
| Well, I have yet to see a good explanation why this choice has been
| made. I am also still searching for a c
I'm new at this but,
?? perhaps ?? cc yourself ??
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:36:40PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
> * On Mon Oct 01, Ben Reser wrote:
> > It's deliberate. Search the archives this discussion has been had
> > several times.
>
> Well, I have yet to see a good explanation w
* On Mon Oct 01, Ben Reser wrote:
> It's deliberate. Search the archives this discussion has been had
> several times.
Well, I have yet to see a good explanation why this choice has been
made. I am also still searching for a convenient way to use an old
message as template for a new one, without
On 2001-10-01 12:12 -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> > When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc
> > e), the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate
> > or an overlook ?
>
> It's deliberate. Search th
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc
> e), the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate
> or an overlook ?
It's deliberate. Search the archives this discussion has been had
several times.
Thus spake Andre Majorel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc e),
> the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate or an
> overlook ?
Yeah, I've noticed that with both mbox and IMAP setups in Mutt.
--
| Justin R. Miller / [EMAIL PR
When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc
e), the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate
or an overlook ?
--
André Majorel http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/>
(Not speaking for my employer, etc.)
12 matches
Mail list logo
