Richard --
...and then Richard G. Ball said...
%
% On [2002-Jan-23] David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% >
% > Looks like your push sequence is just appending to the default name
% > already in the edit buffer. One way around this would be just to put a
% > as the first binding after t
On [2002-Jan-23] David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looks like your push sequence is just appending to the default name
> already in the edit buffer. One way around this would be just to put a
> as the first binding after the ";s".
That does it very nicely, thanks!
Rich
On 2002.01.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Richard G. Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> mutt -nz -F $HOME/.mutt/mutt.archiving -f test-folder -e "push 'T~d -01/01/02
> ;s archivetest
> q'"
>
> but it isn't *quite* working. The file to which the messages are
> written isn't ar
I poked around in the archives and found a simple recipe for saving old messages that
could be run from a command line/script. My version of this became:
#!/bin/sh
mutt -nz -F $HOME/.mutt/mutt.archiving -f test-folder -e "push 'T~d -01/01/02
;s archivetest
q'"
but it isn't *quite* working. The
