Re: Misc vexations and success

2001-03-11 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Dave Murray proclaimed on mutt-users that: > sendmail-8.11.3 but had to purge all of the old rpm stuff & compile from > tarball. The purge was required to get rid of the /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail 8.11.3 should install out of the box - and overwrite your previous sendmail while installing it.

Re: Misc vexations and success

2001-03-10 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Dave Murray proclaimed on mutt-users that: > mailcap: > I've tried every example that I could find, it goes to lynx only, won't go to > netscape. Normally that's OK, but if there is a secure link, my lynx won't > do. Newer lynx versions support http over ssl... or try links (or w3m).

Misc vexations and success

2001-03-10 Thread Dave Murray
Thanks to all who helped me get mut going, arff, arff, ahooo! Sucesses: sendmail-8.11.3 but had to purge all of the old rpm stuff & compile from tarball. The purge was required to get rid of the /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail script. Now it runs on demand for me, no start, stop, restart, status.

gnupg encrypt success!

2000-07-24 Thread L Vogtmann
Howdy all! Sorry about cluttering up this group with my problems about not being able to encrypt with mutt. I've finally found the problem! It didn't have anything to do with the gpg.rc files, .muttrc, or any of that. My menu wasn't coming up because one of the internals opera

Re: Qmail success, no procmail

2000-07-01 Thread Ronny Haryanto
On 30-Jun-2000, Jason Helfman wrote: > I am currently looking how to achieve procmail filtering via Qmail Put something like this in your .qmail file: |preline procmail And proceed with your .procmailrc as usual. Ronny

Re: Qmail success, no procmail

2000-06-30 Thread Brian D. Winters
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 09:27:56PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: > |preline -f /usr/bin/procmail I'm not sure about the -f. I don't use it in my .qmail, but based on the description in the man page I don't see why it would cause procmail to fail either. My guess would be that you are having procm

Re: Qmail success, no procmail

2000-06-30 Thread Jason Helfman
/home/deklown/Maildir/ |preline -f /usr/bin/procmail On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 09:14:54PM -0700, Brian D. Winters muttered: | > I am currently looking how to achieve procmail filtering via Qmail, but | | Have you tried: | | |preline procmail | | in your .qmail file? (I believe that this is in

Re: Qmail success, no procmail

2000-06-30 Thread Brian D. Winters
> I am currently looking how to achieve procmail filtering via Qmail, but Have you tried: |preline procmail in your .qmail file? (I believe that this is in the qmail documentation somewhere.) > in the mean time, why is there a (0) byte indication in the index of > every message that comes in?

Qmail success, no procmail

2000-06-30 Thread Jason Helfman
I am currently looking how to achieve procmail filtering via Qmail, but in the mean time, why is there a (0) byte indication in the index of every message that comes in??? -- /helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always been in your possession." Fingerp

Re: Success! Do you know which MUA I am using for sending this email??

2000-05-22 Thread clemensF
> Charles Curley: > Now, if you run X, look at fetchmailconf. Get your configuration into > .fetchmailrc, which will save you a lot of typing and is less error prone. even without python, the language fetchmailconf is written in, the text was enlightening as to making a .fetchmailrc. -- clemen

Re: Success! Do you know which MUA I am using for sending this email??

2000-05-22 Thread Charles Curley
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 09:26:10PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -> Hi all/Emily, -> -> Success! I just discovered that I had accidentally deleted the symlink in /usr/sbin/sendmail which called postfix, so that was why the messages weren't being sent at all. -> -> T

Re: success!

2000-05-21 Thread Emily Slocombe
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000521 20:00]: | |#fetchmail |#mutt |#.send (name of a small script that came with postfix) can't really help with pushing the qmail queue, as I don't know much about it. But for fetchmail, you could benefit from running it in daemon mode. Just specify it

Re: success!

2000-05-21 Thread Mikko Hänninen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 21 May 2000: > thank you for all the tips! Now everything works fine: Good to hear that. :-) > I would just like to know how the "email-gurus" :-) retrieve their > email, enter their MUA and then have it sent to their ISP without using > as ma

success!

2000-05-21 Thread root
Hi Emily, thank you for all the tips! Now everything works fine: I had accidentally deleted /usr/sbin/sendmail, but now postfix already sends my messages correctly (hopefully it will also send this one...! :-). I would just like to know how the "email-gurus" :-) retrieve their email, enter the

Success! Do you know which MUA I am using for sending this email??

2000-05-21 Thread root
Hi all/Emily, Success! I just discovered that I had accidentally deleted the symlink in /usr/sbin/sendmail which called postfix, so that was why the messages weren't being sent at all. Then I called a small script (copied from the postfix docs) which flushes the mail queue and I