Re: [MLO] Re: MLO 4.0 Update

2012-06-28 Thread Holmes245
LORight, I've done that too. MLO is very lightweight and very powerful IMO. Joel On Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:54:00 AM UTC-4, robisme wrote: > > I must admit that whenever I try another program, I quickly come back to > MLO, which is incomparably more ergonomic and powerful than any other. >

Re: [MLO] Re: MLO 4.0 Update

2012-06-28 Thread Holmes245
I do agree CTenorman, I have looked around only to come back because I have found MLO to be the most useful. Among all the to do list/personal task management software out there, whether install or download, I can't find anything that has matched MLO. I guess my real concern is whether or not v

Re: [MLO] Re: MLO 4.0 Update

2012-06-28 Thread robisme
I must admit that whenever I try another program, I quickly come back to MLO, which is incomparably more ergonomic and powerful than any other. Le jeudi 28 juin 2012 09:36:55 UTC+2, CTenorman a écrit : > > I'm not sure that's the case. I mean, when I compare the functionality and > usefulness o

Re: [MLO] Re: MLO 4.0 Update

2012-06-28 Thread CTenorman
I'm not sure that's the case. I mean, when I compare the functionality and usefulness of MLO vs everything else on iOS, Android, Windows, etc., I'm continually blown away by what Andrey's done. If anyone can do it, I suspect he can. However, if it is turning out to be more than he'd anticipated