Or does this work for you: hit Alt C and you get a pop up list of Contexts
in the Context field on the Properties pane. Start typing the name of your
context and it progressively matches to what you are typing. Sounds to me
like an exact match to your requirement.:-)
You can also select m
That's a coincidence - I was planning to post a suggestion that Andrey
should look at GetSatisfaction which is a similar sort of service (I think)
which is used by another service that I subscribe to. I don't have a strong
view either way but something that would allow us to see more easily whethe
Yes - I was also confused by this behaviour. As far as I can see, when
you change the column settings for a ToDo view, they are saved
automatically. For example, if you add a new column to a view, a star
appears against the file name in the title bar but not against the view name
- so you don
Something like this would be quite good but I would definitely prefer to
have it in the form of Google Toolbar Gadget as I have the toolbar
permanently docked on the right hand side of my screen so the gadgets are
permanently on view. The MLO gadget would fit nicely on there and would
always be vi
Generally in MLO, when you enter a partial date/time, it always defaults to
the nearest date/time that matches what you have entered in the future.
Thus if I enter 10am and it is 11am, it defaults to 10am tomorrow.
However, it doesn't do this if you enter day/month. For example, I have
just en
The recent discussion where a new user is having problems getting his
Contexts to work, does highlight something that I have struggled with when
using MLO, namely it is not very clear whether the contexts for a tasks are
open or closed. Unless I am missing something, you have to open the
Context
Another thought, are you Including Context's in other contexts?It is
some time since I used this but if you are then I think that if you have
assigned a child context to a task, then both the child and the parent
context need to be closed in order for that task to not appear in the ToDo
list.
What have you got the Action filter set to?If it isn't set to Active,
try setting it to this.
This functionality has been in MLO for the last few years and hasn't really
changed and there have been no reports of any problems in this forum so it
feels to me that it is something that you are doi
There is a 'bug' - when you use F8 to adjust the open/closed times for one
or more contexts, and click close, there is no automatic change in the
ToDo view. You have to hit F5 to refresh the view which will then take
account of the adjusted open/closed times.
Andrey has acknowledged this as
e did I spend my time
>
>
> Yes I also tried Pomodoro technique and like it. I will
> analyze how implement it in MLO. You know I do not like hard
> coded solutions and always trying to find a flexible way :-)
>
> Thanks for the suggestions!
>
> Andrey.
>
> On
This is also very good news. Can I suggest that you have a look at the
Pomodoro Technique (http://www.pomodorotechnique.com/) which has a simple
mechanism for estimating the time each task is going to take and then
recording how much time it does take.
I have started using this and found it very
] Re: Feature request: add drop down to Back
> button to show most recent tasks visited
>
>
> > PS: the best solution to this problem would be to allow multiple
> > windows to be opened on the same MLO file.
>
> Yes this is planned.
>
> Andrey.
>
> On O
That's funny, I was thinking yesterday (again) how a facility like this
would be very useful.
However, I don't use Autofocus (not heard of it before- will check it out)
and don't really understand what the third step is about.In my case, I
set the Due Date of the task to a new date/time when
Or, as I suggested a while back (which would be my preference, I think),
have a Google Toolbar app which provided a view of one's current ToDo list
and which allows you tick stuff off. Although I get the feeling that
Google Toolbar apps are seen to be a bit out of date now.
If you want some
Yes - so I gather but as a peripheral member of that community, it had
completely passed me by up until now.
One of the things that I liked about it from an initial scan was the fact
that he draws on the work of a range of other interesting people one of whom
is Tom Gilb who, it could be argue
This sounds good. Some questions:
* is the manual sort order specific to a particular view (ie: if you
create a manual order in one view and then switch to a different view and
select manual order there, will those tasks sort in the same way?). I think
I would prefer to have separate manual o
There has been some debate about what to do about these and I think I have
just seen the solution (for me at least)
A folder has two characteristics:
* it does not appear in the ToDo list; and
* it does not have a tick box and therefore cannot be marked as
completed - this was added
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of chuckdevee
> Sent: 22 October 2009 8:55 a
> To: MyLifeOrganized
> Subject: [MLO] Feature Request: Dependency for Task Dates
> (based on completion of another task)
>
I quite often find that I have to navigate away from the area where I am
focussed in order to add/update other tasks and then need to get back to
this area again.
The back button is quite useful in this respect but if it had a drop down
that listed out the most recent tasks visited, this would
+1 Something like this would be good. Or as somebody else suggested a
while back, if I remember correctly allowing a dependency to specify a lead
or lag (although that might work slightly differently, I guess).
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:
The conclusion that I would highlight from this discussion (which I
certainly feel) is that Move is now one of the weakest elements of MLO's
generally good set of features.
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Any chance of you building something that would allow multiple windows to be
opened on a single file at the same time?:-)
This would have to be in my top 5 enhancements for MLO. (Tabs for views
are good too but less important for me)
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@goo
Ah - I had forgotten that. That would deal with the second of my points.
Thanks
Interestingly the Help is silent on Task Dependencies for both the Active
and Available filters. I don't use these very much but I presume they are
also considered in determining what appears in the Active filter
+1
+1 to 'All actions except completed'
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Top Cat
> Sent: 13 October 2009 2:23 p
> To: MyLifeOrganized
> Subject: [MLO] Re: Feature Suggestion: clearer terminology &
> m
>
> Hi Lisa, my objection to these unnecessary properties just
> relates to clarity. Everyone uses MLO in different ways of
> course, but what's the point of assigning a folder to be a
> 'goal' if you can't complete it? Shouldn't a folder just
> really be a label, with some additional feature
+1
-Original Message-
From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
[mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Levison
Sent: 16 October 2009 2:02 a
To: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MLO] When a task has a start or due date the reminder should
default to that date
A
+1
I am using flags in a similar way (eg to flag my most important tasks)
R
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of qhamel
> Sent: 10 October 2009 2:21 a
> To: MyLifeOrganized
> Subject: [MLO] Re: Feature Re
nd "relative" when you
> drag with Shift pressed : )
>
> /// Sergey
>
> On Oct 8, 3:18 pm, "Richard Collings" wrote:
> > ie: when you select multiple tasks and adjust the sliders - eg move
> > them down a notch, this should move the sliders on all the
> sele
Er - why (re filtering out future dated tasks)? And what do you mean by
dynamic sorting (as before - just interested).
-Original Message-
From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
[mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Lisa Stroyan
Sent: 08 October 2009 9:38 p
To: mylifeorga
I am interested in what you would both use outline filtering for. Not
being negative here, just interested.
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of pkelecy
> Sent: 07 October 2009 1:34 p
> To: MyLifeOrganiz
ie: when you select multiple tasks and adjust the sliders - eg move them
down a notch, this should move the sliders on all the selected tasks down
notch (rather than, as it does at the moment, set the task sliders on the
selected tasks to the absolute value of where you have moved the slider's
to
gt; (as I tried to explain
> above) then this would become a really advanced and most
> useful feature because one could have a host of recuring
> tasks that do not nag us with 'due dates' but rather nudge up
> in the hierarchy based on their calculated importance. It
>
+1I made a similar request recently (although in my case, I used the
term 'Dead')
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dan
> Sent: 07 October 2009 1:19 a
> To: MyLifeOrganized
> Subject: [MLO] Feature R
This is an interesting idea which I have a lot of sympathy with but unless I
am missing something, I am not clear how this would work. Are you
suggesting an additional date field? Or what?
Would one way of implementing this to simply have an option ''Don't show
dates in Todo view' (or something
I think you would need to add (not(HasIncompleteSubTasks)) too.
My point is that it is not straight forward to produce an Active View which
includes future tasks and I would have thought that people who are
interested in using MLO for planning would find this a useful view.
It would seem t
Am I missing something but is it quite difficult/impossible to have a view
which is the same as the Active filter but which includes items in the
future and which ignores the Start Date and the Complete Sub-tasks in order?
The problem with trying to do this with the All filter and then applying
A
Thanks, Mike. Some of the parents are projects as defined by GTD (and are
marked as such) but others are folders where I have grouped a set of tasks
that I want to look at a particular point in the day or week (eg
@EveningCatchUp).
And what I would like to be able to do is get to the parent (or
then a
copy with the column gone.
>
> On Sep 8, 11:51 pm, "Richard Collings" wrote:
> > I don't think this is the cause.
> >
> > I am pretty certain that I have seen the following
> situation: 1. add
> > column to view 2. save view - asterisk d
I was hoping to use this dialog box to remove the assignments from a context
for a group of tasks so I selected the tasks in the Outline view and clicked
on the ... box next to the Context's field in the Properties window which
pops up the 'Select context' dialog box.
I had expected it to show t
I have just had an idea about this. The main time that I want to access the
parent is to adjust the Due Date that is determining the date shown against
a child that is appearing in the To Do view.
Could we have an icon which appears when the Due Date for an item is being
determined by an item hi
.
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Richard Collings
> Sent: 08 September 2009 9:52 p
> To: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [MLO] Re: MLO doesn't always remember column s
At the moment, if you go into the Context's dialog box and (eg) change the
Hours of a context and click Close, the To Do list doesn't not refresh to
reflect the change. You have to hit F5. I would imagine this would be
confusing for beginners and it is an extra and redundant key press.
--~--~---
Advanced Features" - "Input parsing".
>
> One of the undocumented features I've found with parsing is
> that sometimes you don't even need spaces e.g. thu1p will
> give you next thursday at 1pm. Every saved key press helps! ;-)
>
> On Sep 9, 5:5
For some reason, MLO doesn't seem to recognise Thur, Thurs or Thr as
abbreviations for Thursday. I have to type the full name.
Is there some way of finding out what the abbrevations are that it does
recognise? And can they be amended?
If not, can this be changed in a future edition.
Rich
e new settings - save them with the same or new name.
>
> So if you change columns while you in changed view mode the
> new configuration should be saved to the VIEW before you
> close MLO. (Filter->Save settings).
>
> Andrey.
>
>
>
> On Sep 4, 11:47 am, &quo
Ah but you can't open multiple instances on the same file - as far as I can
see. If you start a second instance of MLO (having ticked the 'Allow
multiple instances' box) and then try and open a file that you have open
already in the first instance, the focus just switches to the first
instance a
Lots of requests for this previously in various forms but for the record +1
TBH I think this would be my No 1 request now.
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Stanley
> Sent: 07 September 2009 12:47 a
> T
As just posted, I also have this problem and this is just running MLO on a
single machine.
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of chuckdevee
> Sent: 04 September 2009 8:56 a
> To: MyLifeOrganized
> Subject: [
feorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Richard Collings
> Sent: 04 September 2009 9:48 a
> To: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [MLO] Re: MLO doesn't always remember column settings
> Importance: High
>
>
>
&g
+ 1 to both. Or Ctrl+Enter for new entry - this is still quicker than
Insert - particularly on a laptop.
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Top Cat
> Sent: 06 September 2009 10:01 p
> To: MyLifeOrganize
yLifeOrganized
> Subject: [MLO] Re: Feature request: Hot key to jump to first
> task in To Do list
>
>
>
> On either tab, the Home key moves selection to the top of the list.
>
>
> On Aug 31, 7:09 am, "Richard Collings" wrote:
> > Another minor tweak w
No filters were applied.
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Timothee
> Sent: 04 September 2009 7:06 a
> To: MyLifeOrganized
> Subject: [MLO] Re: Can't order groups by imporance/urgency
> computed score?
task with all subtasks. Done (at least in my version).
>
> The only problem would be if you would like to complete only
> parent task without its subtask. But it should be very rarely
> the case.
>
> Daneb
>
> On Aug 30, 12:11 pm, "Richard Collings" wrote:
My problem (MLO just losing column settings) seems to have gone away - the
settings I have chosen now seem to have stuck so I must have done what ever
it is that you need to do to make sure that MLO saves them. But there is a
definite problem with it not saving them as you would expect.
>
Another minor tweak which would be really helpful. I very often find myself
switching back to the To Do view having done stuff in the Outline view which
has resulted in changes to the To Do list and the first thing I want to do
is jump to the first item in the To Do list. At the moment, it is not
Hmmm - its very odd. I am fairly certain that I have done this (actively
save the file after changing the column settings) and its still losing the
column settings. What is odd that I have tried closing the file and
reopening it after doing the save and the column is still there. And yet
when
lete as you
> select. If you wanted to do a final review before you
> complete multiple items you can always untick auto update
> beforehand and then retick it if the completions are ok.
>
> On Aug 30, 12:05 am, "Richard Collings" wrote:
> > Version 3.0.1
&
Version 3.0.1
Doesn't appear to work in the To Do view - just completes the task that has
been ticked.
> -Original Message-
> From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of pottster
> Sent: 29 August 2009 4:30 p
> To: MyLifeOrganized
> Su
> >
> > > 1) Don't use the urgency slider
> > > 2) Set the preference to by importance only
> > > 3) Use the hierarchal priority method
> >
> > > That should suffice for anyone's needs; the program has
> got so many
> > > diffe
Hi Bob
Thanks for the detailed reply. I have a question and then an observation
re:
>
> The weekly goal was an option carried over from the
> Hierarchal Method; that just got grafted into the CSA.
>
> It simply affects Urgency; and it's from before the urgency
> slider was added. It was a
Hi Bob - you wrote:
>
> The depth of the outline really shouldn't come into play
> UNLESS you use the WEEKLY GOAL setting. The weekly goal
> applies a HUGE boost and that does cascade down because
> that's the original design intent. It was the HOLLY CRAP
> feature to make something POP to th
Hi Bob
Really interested in what you say about Rev2 trying to make depth in the
outline less of a factor in the scoring process. This is my major hate in
MLO - the way in which lower level items are automatically made more
important than higher level items to the extent that it is often impossi
Interesting idea.
I was going to suggest that an option was added to the ordering options
which provide a the option to select a non-recursive algorithm so that lower
level items are not automatically ordered in front of other items which are
higher in the hierarchy - my most hated feature of
I would vote for something like this.
> -Original Message-
> From: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of pottster
> Sent: 25 June 2009 11:05 a
> To: MyLifeOrganized
> Subject: [MLO] Re: Feature Request: Planing the week
>
>
>
> How a
This has been my major complaint about MLO for the last two years (and other
people have periodically made the same complaint) but for some reason (which
I still don't understand) it does not appear to feature in Andrey's list of
priorities and he is almost completely silent on the subject.
:-(
This sounds remarkably like the calendar view that has been much requested!!
> -Original Message-
> From: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> jaydog@googlemail.com
> Sent: 13 June 2009 6:11 p
> To: MyLifeOrganized
> Subject: [M
All I can say is Agree Totally x 3
Unfortunately, it looks as if we are in a minority. The focus of recent
releases has been on improving filtering and on formatting. I am hoping
that this work is now complete (as it is of little interest to me) and that
Andrey will turn his attention to some
I don't think it allows you to open the same file more than once - I am
still on a much older version when you open a second copy of MLO and then
try and open the .ml file that you have open in the first instance, the
focus just switches to the first instance.
This has been a much requested featu
googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Richard Collings
> Sent: 29 April 2009 1:21 a
> To: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [MLO] Re: how to modify a specific instance of a
> recurring task
>
>
>
> There have been a number of
There have been a number of requests for this. I would certainly find it
very useful.
At the moment, there are two options:
1) Go into the recurrence dialog and change the date there
2) Add a sub-task with the same name. It will be this task that appears
in the To Do list and you can then
A much requested and in my view, eminently sensible, feature, but one on
which, sadly, Andrey is completely silent - which I tend to take as a 'No'.
Its certainly not included in the next round of enhancements just announced
which will take us to Version 3. :-(
> -Original Message-
>
If it helps - I agree that this is an individual preference. OK - so there
are bunch of other people out there who say it is not necessary but in my
view they are wrong!!! It may work for some but it doesn't work for me.
What Andrey has to weigh up is whether there are enough of use "Getting
T
l to create today's job list.
>
> Nick
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Collings
> Sent: 15 March 2009 11:57
> To: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [MLO] Re: Prioritizing Items ToDo Today - Suggestions Wanted
>
>
>
> >
>
-
From: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
[mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Levison
Sent: 13 March 2009 8:45 p
To: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MLO] Re: Feature Request: gant view.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Richard Collings
wrote:
OK - standard Scrum type s
+1 (just in case anybody was in any doubt). Anything that allows me to see
more clearly how much work plans are looking over the next few days/weeks is
to be massively welcomed.
> -Original Message-
> From: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] O
>
> If exact ordering is required, then it might pay to look more
> at how the Outline is structured with the ToDo list views
> just acting as a representation of the existing order.
>
In which case, why use MLO. You can just do this in Word or some other note
taking/outlining software. W
Thanks for doing this, Nick. Your experience mirrors mine exactly with MLO.
MLO has consistently frustrated my attempts to order tasks precisely WHICH
IS WHAT I WANT (Sorry to use capital here but no attempts to persuade me
otherwise is going to succeed - for the reasons that you have succinctly
Another interpretation (from a more jaundiced view) of what Steve is saying
is that using Weekly Goal breaks the Computerised Scoring algorithm
(something I have moaned about in the past) because of the way in which it
recursively boosts the score of everything that is under the item to which
you
...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Levison
Sent: 13 March 2009 1:59 p
To: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MLO] Re: Feature Request: gant view.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Richard Collings
wrote:
Agile people do like their little aphorisms. :-)
Thanks we like to think we're witt
Agile people do like their little aphorisms. :-)
However, I am intrigued - how do you plan? Somebody says to you, 'when
can you get this done by?' how do you work it out?
-Original Message-
From: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
[mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
(What Nick says)^2
But I guess that is no surprise!
> -Original Message-
> From: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of metroboy
> Sent: 10 March 2009 5:05 p
> To: MyLifeOrganized
> Subject: [MLO] Re: Prioritizing Items ToDo Today - Sug
There have been previous requests for a separate feature to be able to
change the due date of current instance of a recurring task (but without
changing overall recurrence pattern for the task) for precisely the reason
you outline, Alinda.
I have to do this all the time - eg I have something that
Hi Nick
An excellent post which I also agree with a 100%. Just picking out a couple
of points to emphasise:
>I could keep coming and scanning that
> list over and over...but I am cursed with being easily
> distracted, and with rethinking decisions that have already
> been made. So every ti
nd of the day or
> when you next have breathing room for processing time, get
> your outline up to date again.
>
> On Feb 13, 7:46 pm, "Richard Collings" wrote:
> > > As to manual priorities - I don't really think it is good idea.
> >
> > &g
> As to manual priorities - I don't really think it is good idea.
>
> Just imagine: You have thousands of tasks in your MLO
> database - all waiting for your attention. And some day you
> think "oh - it's good idea to complete task1 today! - and
> assign it highest priority". But for some re
Agreed. It would be good to make these options 'sticky' (ie: MLO remembers
what you chose last time)
> -Original Message-
> From: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Eberhard
> Sent: 10 February 2009 2:18 p
> To: MyLifeOrganized
> S
I feel sure I have voted on this in the past but just in case
+1 Today Goal
+1 Manual Sorting
> -Original Message-
> From: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of TimV
> Sent: 05 February 2009 5:08 p
> To: MyLifeOrganized
> Subject: [MLO]
; click on the tray icon and from there you can start or stop
> the program.
>
> I'll try to post some screenshots to the new google group.
>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
> On Feb 3, 10:13 pm, "Richard Collings" wrote:
> > Hi Jon
> >
> > This sounds
Hi Jon
This sounds like a really interesting tool (I was thinking just the other
day that it would be really good to be able to block sites that I keep
getting distracted by (eg news sites)).
However, I do have some questions about your product (eg how easily can one
switch the blocking on and o
Hmmm. Some questions:
1. What order will the tasks be in when you first switch to Manual sort?
2. What happens when you (say) change the context in the Manual Sort view
such that those tasks that were on display are filtered out; but a whole
stack of new tasks appears - what order will these
> This "Manual Sort" option would really help me polish my GTD
> implementation. Currently I mark Next Actions in the outline
> (using Weekly Goals), and then select a subset of these Next
> Actions to do today (using Due Dates). The problem is that
> I'm left with 7 to 10 items in my "Today
sly fiddling with the
> > Importance and Urgency sliders just to get the final order that I
> > want!
> >
> > I've seen this functionality in other to-do programs, so it
> certainly
> > seems possible. For example, Agenda At Once, Vitalist, and
> > Ess
This is high on my list (and a number of others) but previous requests have
sadly elicited a deafening silence (as far as I can see) from Andrey (which
I am interpreting as a 'No'). Happy to hear otherwise.
> -Original Message-
> From: myLifeOrganized@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:mylifeor
> Yup, this would be critical if MLO is to add the significant
> value of time management too (which would take it a step
> beyond GTD which pretty much ignores this aspect of real life)
>
Hey that's interesting. Not having read GTD from cover to cover, I hadn't
realised that GTD just doesn't
> projects and provide a clear view of what my hardlandscape
> items are for a any day, appart from unscheduled tasks, and
> long duration tasks. But I fear a Gantt approach would be
> tons more work that what I am suggesting.
>
> If it would help, we could call what I want a &
Oooh - so there is. I remembered the slider but had forgotten the Time
Required fields. As far as I can remember, they are purely memo fields - ie
MLO does not do anything with them. My recollection from when I was first
looking at MLO is that I was quite disappointed by this. But happy to be
I would definitely vote for something that allowed me to specify in absolute
terms the amount of effort I reckon is involved in a task (in hours or
days).
Note: in my terminology: effort is the actual time I spend working on
something; elapsed time is the difference between the end date/time
But without moving the tasks in the Outline hierarchy? Yes?
The more I thought about it, the more 'wrong' this seemed.If I am
working on two or three projects (which is fairly typical) what I want to be
able to do with MLO is order these tasks manually in the To Do lists without
the tasks
I agree 100% with all of this.What I need is some form of very cut down
Gantt charty sort of thing where I can enter actual time estimates for each
activity (or at least those activities that I need to plan out in detail)
and then have MLO wrap this around my fixed appointments and my routine
+1
I know Andrey is not keen to make future predictions but has he said
anything to indicate his thinking on this.
If not, Andrey, could you at least give some indication of whether a
calendar is a) completely out of the question; or b) something that you will
give some consideration to at so
201 - 300 of 305 matches
Mail list logo
