+1 to being able to fiter in the Outline view. A NOT option would
also be useful. At the moment, I am managing a list that has grownn
too long by adding a @Now context to those tasks that I want to do in
the short term. I would be really useful to be able to have an
Outline view which just con
he Outline view if you are in the To Do
view
b) there isn't a Hotkey option for it
On Aug 29, 4:40 pm, RichardCollings wrote:
> Thanks. I was aware of this option. It is also possible to show the
> name of the parent a column This is the approach that I have taken
> which is very
Thanks. I was aware of this option. It is also possible to show the
name of the parent a column This is the approach that I have taken
which is very useful but it doesn't do everything that I need -
specifically to be able to
a) mark the Parent as done from the To Do view
b) adjust the properti
Hmmm - may have spoken too soon. But its very odd
If I choose:
* Action filter: All
* Group by: Project
* Sort by: Computed score (decending) << this wasn't set when I made
my previous post
* Context: @Weekend Projects
I get my projects as group headings with (some of [*]) their tasks
un
+1
Ecco had a very powerful set of capabilities for managing what was
shown in the hierarchy. In particular, you could choose an item and
1. Show all items under an item to a specific level (Shift+Ctrl+
1..9)
2. Expand all items under a specific item (Alt + Double click on
item or Ctrl G)
t; "hidden" features will be documented someday.
>
> ~ Mike
>
>
>
> RichardCollings wrote:
> > Ah ha! I hadn't noticed the little triangles. I am still trying to
> > get my head round the way in which they work. Quite a clever idea but
> > needs
Ah ha! I hadn't noticed the little triangles. I am still trying to
get my head round the way in which they work. Quite a clever idea but
needs a bit more explanation - would it be possible to pop up some
bubble help to explain what is going on (? switchable).
On Aug 24, 1:40 am, Mike wrote:
>
I have to say that I am generally puzzled by the selection behaviour
when switching between views. I have only just upgraded to V3 (from
V1.9) and this aspect of the behaviour seems very different and
idiosyncratic. eg if you select multiple tasks in the To Do view,
then nothing is selected in
Actually on reflection, changing the second option so that it is
* skip all overdue occurrences
would solve my problem without needing to add a third option. ie: if
the occurrence falling on today's date (if it does) either doesn't
have a time or the time is earlier than now, the next occurre
It just doesn't work for me - the fact that you have broken one
activity down into more steps and to a deeper level doesn't
automatically make those individual tasks more important if you boost
their common parent.If they are more important/urgent, I can go
in and make adjustments at that lev
both large data sets and small data
> sets. People do get confused when I jump in to fix something when that
> conversation started out as a discussion of a short list. I'm usually
> not trying to fix the short list results. Rather I see something that
> makes me realize there is a problem wit
Hi Bob
Thanks very much for taking the time to reply in such detail. I can
undertand your reluctance to go over ground that was clearly covered
in some detail some time ago (before I got involved with MLO).
I would be very interested to know if one of the sliders does not
apply a recursive boos
If we can't open multiple windows on the same file, then more tabs
would be better than nothing.
On Jun 25, 11:03 am, Darius wrote:
> I desperatly need more tabs. Now all information is accesible only
> through two tabs and it's very inconvenient, as I cannot access
> specific information throug
As another baffled person, I would agree that this would be a useful
feature. The one time I did try to spend some time working out why I
couldn't get MLO to order things the way I wanted, it was made much
worse by only being able to see the score for one task at the time. I
ended up creating a
On Jun 20, 10:58 am, Andrey wrote:
> Changing task order manually on To-Do in unsorted mode is in my plan.
:-))
> I have already posted here all the technical difficulties to implement
> it. I just need time to design it carefully without affecting current
> design.
>
I can see that it is goin
On Jun 19, 2:29 pm, Alexis wrote:
> Let´s elaborate how and when manual sorting would make sense. Assume
> the Do-List is sorted by computed score. The dragging of a task within
> tasks with identical property-values (Imp. Urg. Due) should be no
> problem. If you would drag the task to a posit
On Jun 19, 9:18 am, Sergey wrote:
> While last is defining sequence of
> actions or events (what you want to do in To-Do list) and strictly
> follow it, first (task-oriented) is getting of list of tasks which you
> _should_ do, and that is just a prompt. you read the list and decide
> what to do
+1 - just in case there was any doubt!
On Mar 28, 12:28 pm, "Richard Collings" wrote:
> A much requested and in my view, eminently sensible, feature, but one on
> which, sadly, Andrey is completely silent - which I tend to take as a 'No'.
>
> Its certainly not included in the next round of enhan
18 matches
Mail list logo
