I'm not sure if there will be an answer to this Wayne. I would like an
update too but I think I hear Andrey in the kitchen over there banging pots
and pans around. I think he's cooking up something good but I'm not sure if
it's ready to come out of the oven yet.
Joel
On Monday, June 4, 2012
However, that said, it wouldn't hurt to have an "appetizer". That's all
we're asking for Andrey.
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 9:47:46 PM UTC-4, Holmes245 wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if there will be an answer to this Wayne. I would like an
> update too but I think I hear Andrey in the kitchen over t
Well, the thing is there hasn't been an update for a long time and I think
we deserve one. Silence isn't golden.
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 1:51:02 PM UTC+12, Holmes245 wrote:
>
> However, that said, it wouldn't hurt to have an "appetizer". That's all
> we're asking for Andrey.
>
>
>
> On Saturda
I really like this google group here. I've learned so much here and got so
many ideas how to get out more from MLO.
>From time to time somebody is asking about MLO 4.0, or in general when
there will be a new release.
I propose the following: Stop asking about MLO 4.0 and start using the
plenty
Yes, you're right Bedrudin. I have made a decision, as you have suggested,
to stop inquiring because MLO as it stands now has a lot more features
than many personal task managers already have so I can be patient. Good
point.
On Friday, June 29, 2012 10:22:34 PM UTC-4, Bedrudin wrote:
>
> I r
Glad that you're pleased with the current functionality. I value it highly
too but I think you're missing the point(s).
1) Nothing can afford to stand still for long in the modern world - least
of all software. If you look at the origins of MLO it's own successful
birth came out of the neglect
Pottster, I actually do get your point and understand and I have actually
looked around, even on alternativeto.net and have yet to find anything with
the matching power of MLO is all I meant. I may not be a power user
(although recently I realized I haven't been using MLO as effectively) so I
a
I'm having a little bit of trouble with this thread.
First of all, I only looked in the thread because it mentioned a version
4.0 and I hadn't heard anything about that. I thought I was going to see a
thread created by Andrey and I certainly didn't think that my "view" would
be counted as yet
David, no offense (you are correct though) but I would recommend reading
the thread before you post. It's been beaten to death and restating what's
already been discussed only opens it up again. I think we're good on this.
Joel
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 5:20:42 PM UTC-4, David R. wrote:
>
> I
Andrey's roadmap for 4.0 is
here https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mylifeorganized/HtsjfdVatbs/discussion.
This was published September last year so not really any "rushing" going on
which is sort of the point of the thread. The fact that you are one of many
who viewed the thread just shows the
I am not being critical or making a personal attack, just stating my
perspective on this.
When I purchased this I was not promised any new versions at all. Sure
there is always that expectation but the reality is I purchased a fully
functional product and all I can expect is for it to perform as
I really like the parrallel you make daniel with the Windows and Mac versions,
and I have the big impression that this is what's happening here too. I have a
Mac, and an Iphone, and I can see and feel in the blogs how Apple manages the
output of info. when a futur product, or futur version is ex
A small software shop like MLO has to face, daily, the fact that there are
many important and worthwhile things that will not get done because
resources are needed elsewhere. A huge shop can hire a marketing team to
orchestrate and execute a series of briefings, leaks, and disclosures that
keep eve
It's been over 7 months that this version was announced, creating a lot of
expectation on the part of customers we all are.
It's REALLY time to communicate at least some major features they are
working on.
That way, I could continue using MLO knowing that the next version will
allow me some feat
The fact that this thread has had 168 views (and counting) and is the most
viewed non-pinned thread since the group was formed suggests there is a lot
of expectation out there. Whilst there is, quite rightly, a lot of goodwill
and respect for Andrey, it's not a static marketplace and it would be
Is anyone a part of the beta at all? I know a post went out for beta
testers but has anyone actually started beta testing it that can confirm
that it's in the works? This also makes me question exactly how big
Andrey's team is. I'm sure it's a small development team but it's the
non-communicati
*Correction:* "Not in the works. I know it's in the works. I meant to say I
was just curious if anyone could confirm, who's beta testing it, that it's
coming along and possibly getting close to completion. Andrey's been
talking about development at least since 7/2011 I know (I asked him about
i
I'm not sure that's the case. I mean, when I compare the functionality and
usefulness of MLO vs everything else on iOS, Android, Windows, etc., I'm
continually blown away by what Andrey's done. If anyone can do it, I
suspect he can.
However, if it is turning out to be more than he'd anticipated
I must admit that whenever I try another program, I quickly come back to
MLO, which is incomparably more ergonomic and powerful than any other.
Le jeudi 28 juin 2012 09:36:55 UTC+2, CTenorman a écrit :
>
> I'm not sure that's the case. I mean, when I compare the functionality and
> usefulness o
I do agree CTenorman, I have looked around only to come back because I have
found MLO to be the most useful. Among all the to do list/personal task
management software out there, whether install or download, I can't find
anything that has matched MLO. I guess my real concern is whether or not
v
LORight, I've done that too. MLO is very lightweight and very powerful IMO.
Joel
On Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:54:00 AM UTC-4, robisme wrote:
>
> I must admit that whenever I try another program, I quickly come back to
> MLO, which is incomparably more ergonomic and powerful than any other.
>
This thread is now up to 337 views and is the most viewed thread in the
history of this group. I would respectfully suggest that the need for an
update is worth consideration.
On Wednesday, 27 June 2012 13:44:05 UTC+1, pottster wrote:
>
> The fact that this thread has had 168 views (and counting
+1
Is the development team really comfortable giving the impression they don't
care about their user base? How long does it take to put together a quick
update post?
It almost feels like Andrey's attitude is something along the lines of "oh,
keep talking little people.. you're stuck with my g
I think we need to keep things in perspective here. First, there have been
updates and lots of them - for the mobile platforms. And personally, I'm
very glad that's where the latest updates have been landing. MLO is my LIFE
organized, not just my work at my desk organized. Now, I've got 4 monito
Daniel, those are great points. We need to appreciate what we have from
Andrey because MLO v.3 for Windows still rocks compared to most other
personal task managers in my opinion. I would rather he take the time and
not feel pressured to kick it out fast. When one steps back and looks at
what h
Behalf Of CTenorman
Sent: 07 July 2012 3:45 AM
To: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [MLO] Re: MLO 4.0 Update
I think we need to keep things in perspective here. First, there have been
updates and lots of them - for the mobile platforms. And personally, I'm
very glad that's
(a point which is lost on a lot people here)?
well then please explain since you are obviously so much more advanced. oh
wait by asking that probably means it is lost on me as well
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:36 PM, pottster wrote:
> Andrey's roadmap for 4.0 is here
> https://groups.goo
I'd love to respond but the sign says "Don't Feed The Trolls". Sorry about
that.
On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 13:27:34 UTC+1, daniel sekera wrote:
>
> (a point which is lost on a lot people here)?
>
> well then please explain since you are obviously so much more advanced. oh
> wait by asking that
Okay everyone, as one of the group moderators I'd like to ask that this be
taken off list. I think everything to say has been said. Please refrain from
posting more on this topic and let's get back to talking about how we most
effectively use MLO as it is now.
Thanks!
Lisa
--
Sent from my ph
no thats ok
not trying to necessarily provoke any response and you can call me troll
anytime you want. doesn't hurt my feelings, only words. but comments do
pique my curiosity.
you'll throw casual comments out about "lazy programming" and the like so
it kind of lends itself to a perception that
hmmm was writing my response before I read this message.
I'm just curious is all
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Lisa Stroyan wrote:
> Okay everyone, as one of the group moderators I'd like to ask that this be
> taken off list. I think everything to say has been said. Please refrain
> from
Thanks Lisa. Agree 100%.
On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 16:26:06 UTC+1, Lisa S wrote:
>
> Okay everyone, as one of the group moderators I'd like to ask that this be
> taken off list. I think everything to say has been said. Please refrain
> from posting more on this topic and let's get back to talki
32 matches
Mail list logo
