Aaron,
why doesn't this work? the select works perfectly
Define doesn't work? What is the error message?
create view cost_report as
SELECT c_name, d_manuf as Manufacturer, d_model as Model, count(1) as
Number Enrolled,
d_price as Monthly Price, count(1)*d_price as Cost
FROM `b_devices` A
do a show full processlist on the 4th slave and see what process is running.
This will the sql's running which will be the cause of the slowness.
Also u need to check on the INTERNET bandwidth from the current data center
to the other data center.
On 6/18/08, Sagar, Sanjeev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
nbsp; I have a table where I keep sales transactions, so I'm trying to do a
query that will count the number of transactions per day.
My test data looks like:
--
-- Table structure for table `sales_activity`
--
CREATE TABLE `sales_activity` (
nbsp; `sales_id` int(11) NOT NULL
Re: Do I need to use GROUP BY to do this?
yes
Grant Giddens schrieb:
Hi,
nbsp; I have a table where I keep sales transactions, so I'm trying to do a
query that will count the number of transactions per day.
My test data looks like:
What type of query do I need to get that information?
I happen to have worked on a similar query this morning, so it's in my
mind :)
SELECT SUBSTRING(sales_date,1,10), COUNT(sales_id)
FROM sales_activity
WHERE sales_type = 1
GROUP BY SUBSTRING(sales_date,1,10);
should do the trick.
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 18:21 -0700, Grant Giddens wrote:
Hi,
do a show full processlist on the 4th slave and see what process is
running. This will the sql's running which will be the cause of the
slowness.
This does not help because there is not a specific query, which is
running slow. Other 3 slaves are running same query and Ive compared
the explain
I want to do this:
[1] read a row from table table_1 with select
[2] change a row from [1] with update
[3] change another row in table table_1 with update
But queries [2] and [3] in the time of invoking, assume that row from query
[1] wasn't changed.
Should I use LOCK TABLES? - I've tried that
Hi,
I want to do this:
[1] read a row from table table_1 with select
[2] change a row from [1] with update
[3] change another row in table table_1 with update
But queries [2] and [3] in the time of invoking, assume that row from
query
[1] wasn't changed.
Should I use LOCK TABLES? - I've
