Re: Help with export and import into Oracle

2010-01-12 Thread Grant Allen
machiel.richards wrote: Good day guys [snip] . Each item in the text field is added in the field by entering the country name then pressing enter and then entering the next, etc . When exporting the data to a file (even when enclosing each field within quotes) it still

Force index command in query

2010-01-12 Thread Jeetendra Ranjan
Hi, After analysing slow query log i found that some queries are not using index and so i used the force index command in query and test it and now it starts using index properly.Accordingly i implemented the same query with force index in my application code and regeneratet the slow query

RE: Help with export and import into Oracle

2010-01-12 Thread Jerry Schwartz
It seems that one of the tables we need to export and import contains rows which is used for dropdown menus. This has the following effect: . Each item in the text field is added in the field by entering the country name then pressing enter and then

optimize mysql

2010-01-12 Thread madunix
I need your recommendation, I have the following config file need to be optimized, can any one recommend any modification on this file, lately mysql went slow with update procedure # Example MySQL config file for medium systems. # # This is for a system with little memory (32M - 64M) where MySQL

Re: optimize mysql

2010-01-12 Thread mos
Some other info you can post to the list to help us zero in on the problem: 1) What is the SQL used to update the tables 2) What is the table structure? Show Create Table mytablex 3) How long does it take for how many rows? 4) How busy is the CPU when the updates are occuring? 5) Show Status --

upgrading mysql

2010-01-12 Thread Lawrence Sorrillo
Hi: I want to upgrade a master and slave server from mysql 4.1 to mysql 5.1. I want to so something like follows: 1. Stop all write access to the master server. 2. Ensure that replication on the slave is caught up to the last change on the master. 3. stop binary logging on the master. 4.

Re: upgrading mysql

2010-01-12 Thread Tom Worster
How about: 1 shut down the slave, upgrade it, restart it, let it catch up. 2 shut down the master, upgrade it, restart it, let the slave catch up. ? On 1/12/10 12:34 PM, Lawrence Sorrillo sorri...@jlab.org wrote: Hi: I want to upgrade a master and slave server from mysql 4.1 to mysql

RE: upgrading mysql

2010-01-12 Thread Joshua Gordon
Also see http://dev.mysql.con/doc/refman/5.0/en/mysql-upgrade.html. And make sure you make a backup before you do anything :) -Original Message- From: Tom Worster [mailto:f...@thefsb.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 10:47 AM To: Lawrence Sorrillo; mysql@lists.mysql.com Subject: Re:

Re: upgrading mysql

2010-01-12 Thread Lawrence Sorrillo
This is two upgrades done in sequence(the reload takes about three hours per machine) . I can do what I am proposing in parallel. Do you see it as problematic? ~Lawrence Tom Worster wrote: How about: 1 shut down the slave, upgrade it, restart it, let it catch up. 2 shut down the master,

Re: upgrading mysql

2010-01-12 Thread Shawn Green
Lawrence Sorrillo wrote: Hi: I want to upgrade a master and slave server from mysql 4.1 to mysql 5.1. I want to so something like follows: 1. Stop all write access to the master server. ok 2. Ensure that replication on the slave is caught up to the last change on the master. why? You

Re: upgrading mysql

2010-01-12 Thread Lawrence Sorrillo
Hi: I want to ensure that right after the reload that the same data is present in both the master and the slave. They are in perfect sync. Then I think its safe to consider starting binary logging and replication etc. And after these are started, changes can start? And in setting up

Re: upgrading mysql

2010-01-12 Thread Paul DuBois
On Jan 12, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Lawrence Sorrillo wrote: Hi: I want to ensure that right after the reload that the same data is present in both the master and the slave. They are in perfect sync. Then I think its safe to consider starting binary logging and replication etc. And after these

file per table performance

2010-01-12 Thread Bryan Cantwell
Anyone have information they can provide on the performance hit of using innodb_file_per_table? I'd assume that since there are many individual tables that this would slow performance, but perhaps not. In a huge database, is this not a good idea, or a better one? -- MySQL General Mailing List

Re: file per table performance

2010-01-12 Thread Johnny Withers
There are a few articles on this at MySQL Performance Blog: http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?s=innodb_file_per_table+performance On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Bryan Cantwell bcantw...@firescope.comwrote: Anyone have information they can provide on the performance hit of using

Re: upgrading mysql

2010-01-12 Thread Tom Worster
Frankly, I didn't entirely understand what you were proposing. I got lost around step 6. Is the issue total time for the procedure or service downtime? On 1/12/10 12:58 PM, Lawrence Sorrillo sorri...@jlab.org wrote: This is two upgrades done in sequence(the reload takes about three hours per

Re: upgrading mysql

2010-01-12 Thread Suresh Kuna
Hi, The step 6 in simple terms is Here we need to build two server ( both master and slave ). Instead of building two server as it takes double the time of building in one server. After building an server, make a copy of the first server files at OS level and copy it to the server and start the