Thanks for that link! That's another subtle issue I had not noted.
There are so many combinations, that it is hard to say "do this":
* Incoming bytes are latin1 / utf8 / Microsquish control characters.
* You do/don't have SET NAMES (or equivalent)
* The database/table/column is declared latin1/ut
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Akshay Suryavanshi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 22 indexes are simply too many, assuming they are not composite, which means
> you already have a very large table. Secondly the most important bottleneck
> is shown by the inserts/sec, only 405 inserts is very very slow. This co