ANN: Database Workbench 4.4.0, the multi-DBMS IDE now available!
Ladies, gentlemen,
Upscene Productions is proud to announce the next version
of the popular Windows-based multi-DBMS development tool:
Database Workbench 4.4.0 Pro
This release includes new features and fixes several bugs as
The What's new in MySQL 5.7 manual page [1] says:
* InnoDB now supports spatial data types.
What is the difference to previous releases in this respect?
Spatial column types have been supported by InnoDB (and even
Cluster) for a long time already, and spatial indexes on
spatial columns still
Dear MySQL users,
MySQL Server 5.7.1 (Milestone Release) is a new version of the world's
most popular open source database. This is the first milestone release
of MySQL 5.7.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql-development-cycle/en/development-milestone-releases.html
The new features in these
this table has many columns and only 1 record.
select * from table;
generates an unreadable list.
how can i list the record as in two columns? (column name and its value)?
i looked at UNPIVOT, but could not get it to work.
SQL select * from table UNPIVOTE INCLUDE NULLS;
2013/04/24 09:06 -0700, Rajeev Prasad
this table has many columns and only 1 record. select * from table; generates
an unreadable list. how can i list the record as in two columns? (column name
and its value)? i looked at UNPIVOT, but could not get it to work.
SQL select * from table UNPIVOTE
The What's new in MySQL 5.7 manual page [1] says:
* InnoDB now supports spatial data types.
What is the difference to previous releases in this respect?
The 5.7.1 Release Notes are a bit more specific:
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/relnotes/mysql/5.7/en/news-5-7-1.html
InnoDB: Added support
That is the entire sql statement - I didn't think I needed to list the
1500 ints that are in the in clause.
Also want to mention that I ran explain on it, and it is using the
index on event_id.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Michael Dykman mdyk...@gmail.com wrote:
You would have to show us
I changed it to delete one row at a time and it's taking 3 minutes.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Larry Martell larry.mart...@gmail.com wrote:
That is the entire sql statement - I didn't think I needed to list the
1500 ints that are in the in clause.
Also want to mention that I ran