On 3/30/2016 1:26 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
- On Mar 30, 2016, at 7:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
So i should use the default (autocommit=1)?
no, you should what is appropriate for your application
if you don't care about inserts/updates triggered by let say a
webr
Am 30.03.2016 um 19:26 schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
- On Mar 30, 2016, at 7:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
So i should use the default (autocommit=1)?
no, you should what is appropriate for your application
if you don't care about inserts/updates triggered by let say a
w
- On Mar 30, 2016, at 7:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
>> So i should use the default (autocommit=1)?
>
> no, you should what is appropriate for your application
>
> if you don't care about inserts/updates triggered by let say a
> webrequest are half written due a crash
Am 30.03.2016 um 18:56 schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
- On Mar 28, 2016, at 9:53 PM, shawn l.green shawn.l.gr...@oracle.com wrote:
I read that the converting is not difficult. But has the code of our webapp to
be changed ? It's written in php and perl.
What i understand is that inserts/updates/dele
- On Mar 28, 2016, at 9:53 PM, shawn l.green shawn.l.gr...@oracle.com wrote:
>>
>> I read that the converting is not difficult. But has the code of our webapp
>> to
>> be changed ? It's written in php and perl.
>> What i understand is that inserts/updates/deletions in InnoDB tables have to
