Hello guys,
after upgrading from MySQL 5.1 to 5.5 we encounter a problem that C++
exceptions thrown in an UDF are not catched at all. Even there is a
catch (... ) at the end
or our try block which avoids exceptions to be thrown outside of the
UDF, the server crashes with:
terminate called
guys,
strange things happen when using COUNT() in subqueries. even the use of
HAVING in a SELECT statement turns up a weired result, as it should work
on the result set and should be filtered while rows are returned to the
client.
(you can find the selects and stuff in a more readable way on
hello guys,
after compiling and installing mysql 4.1.9 from sources, the database server
seems to work fine, but everything from client/ seems to somehow hardcode the
client library path into the binary.
when e.g. trying to start mysqladmin it goes:
# mysqladmin
hi gents,
is there a way to do replication where all database fields
on the slave have the same type, but other names?
i didnt investigate a binary log yet to check how queries are
stored there, but maybe one of you has experiences with this kind of
configuration.
kind regards,
heri
Hi Gleb,
is that a no? Not having it in the docs doesnt mean that it is not
possible :)
regards,
heri
- Original Message -
From: Gleb Paharenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: replication and other col names
Hello.
There
hello guys,
im just wondering if there are any limitations in cross database queries like:
SELECT one.* FROM db1.one, db2.two;
are there any differences in joining tables from within various databases to joinin
tables from within the same database?
the background of my question is that various
use mysqldump to dump all your databases.
man mysqldump should help further.
regards,
/H
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 22:49:30 +0100
Pierre-Etienne Mélet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a question concerning the portability of the files of the
database. Is there a way to export the
Hello Mark,
thanks for your answer. In fact the mysql shell where I update the row is
using AUTOCOMMIT=1.
Even after I issue a COMMIT manually the changes are not seen by the
application.
What I dont understand is that the program doing a SELECT has to issue an
COMMIT to have all data available.
Hi Stefan,
Does the second shell actually perform those changes? In this case, I
assume
it's got something to do with the isolation level / consistent read in
InnoDB tables. shell1 sees all its changes immediately, shell2 (the
application) has just a snapshot of the data at the time it
Hello MySQL users,
I have a weired issue using the MySQL C API and InnoDB tables.
An application polls a database every 30 seconds. When the application
starts everything seems to be fine.
During the running of the application i change some rows, but the
application itself doesnt see the changes
10 matches
Mail list logo
