use that as
a basis for searching.
- --
- --
Jayce^
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAkEROA10/0O8cAHgRAgB1AJ4wvDpKg3OkuA9THKtjLxKmLOmPqwCeMkhJ
S3asqfZ24J3CjSKn8xlMDGg=
=R67R
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http:/
I have seen several gedcom -> sql
schema's out there, some for mysql even.
There are also several systems for archiving information such as family events
or media, and linking those people to that data.
--
Jayce^
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
oDB
> tables.
>
> I know I would.
I actually like that idea a lot myself. I know I always try and get
$current_company to get support contracts, but that doesnt' always happen. I
think it'd be cool to 'vote' for future enhancements with our money.
--
--Jayce^
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
ng through perl/DBI, and the problem was that the DBI package merely
needed upgrading, mysql had been set up correctly. If your mysql really is
set up right, you could verify this by trying to perform a transaction via
command line. If it works there, it's your connection most likel
t too.
Jayce^
On Thursday 10 October 2002 10:32 pm, Joel Rees wrote:
> > At 12:58 +0200 10/10/02, Alex Polite wrote:
> > >Is there any way I could display a MySQL database as a filesystem
> > >under Linux?
>
> To which, on Thu, 10 Oct 2002 at 17:56:31 -0500, Paul DuB
7;ve only restarted
once, to enact some .cnf changes. For us, the upgrade has been a godsend.
This is using the official binaries (not RPM if that makes a difference at
all).
Jayce^
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info
me problem we're having.
Jayce^
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 03:27 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:31:56AM -0700, j.random.programmer wrote:
> > If any folks from MySQL AB are reading this:
> >
> > I need to go into production *today* with 3.23.5x. I am us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, you could just base the 100% off the highest returned value.
eg, if 3.95 is the highest return, then, that's your 100%, the others are just
percentages of that.
Jayce^
On Monday 29 April 2002 01:44 pm, Mouratidis wrote:
> Actually,
on (on the order of .5TB) and would love to be able to
> create the data files off-line and add them as needed.
>
> Jeremy
Ditto, I know this is one thing keeping us from going to Innodb full scale.
Jayce^
-
Before posting,
