On 9/26/07, Baron Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think you're gaining anything by doing this though, unless it is
> extremely expensive to do a lookup in item.
Thanks Baron,
I wanted to be sure I didn't miss a key feature.
As the lookup in item is not expensive at all, I will keep
Hi all,
I have a list of values I get from my application and I want to
generate a record set based on this list (for an INSERT INTO ...
SELECT).
Today I have sth like:
SELECT 54, item.item_id, mdv.valueInt
FROM item i, metadata_value mdv
WHERE mdv.item_id = 20202
AND mdv.field_id = 54
AND i.ite
On 4/19/07, Manuel Vacelet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I wonder what is the impact of the disk space left for a mysql DB
(MyIsam, Linux 2.6, Ext3, RAID5).
I mean, I there a kind of limit to not cross to limit the performances impact ?
Hi everybody,
Nobody can answer my question
Hi all,
I wonder what is the impact of the disk space left for a mysql DB
(MyIsam, Linux 2.6, Ext3, RAID5).
I mean, I there a kind of limit to not cross to limit the performances impact ?
Cheers,
Manuel
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscrib
2007/2/15, Manuel Vacelet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all,
I'm facing a strange behaviour with an UPDATE statement.
I have a table like:
+-+--+
| item_id | rank |
+-+--+
|2812 |2 |
| 13050 |4 |
| 13051 |3 |
| 13052 |1 |
+-+---
Hi all,
I'm facing a strange behaviour with an UPDATE statement.
I have a table like:
+-+--+
| item_id | rank |
+-+--+
|2812 |2 |
| 13050 |4 |
| 13051 |3 |
| 13052 |1 |
+-+--+
And I want to switch items 2812 and 13052 rank (i.e. assi
Hi all,
I have query that joins 2 tables. I have an index on each part of the
join but unfortunately the 2 columns don't have the same type so the
index is not used for the join (I guess it's the reason why). On one
hand I have an INT and on the other and a VARCHAR.
Is there any way to write the
2006/11/16, Peter Brawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Michael,
>SELECT t1.id, t1.version, t1.value
>FROM data t1
>LEFT JOIN data t2 ON t1.id=t2.id AND t1.version < t2.version
>WHERE t2.id IS NULL;
>I had almost the same problem and I found this solution very smart...
>even smarter than I can unde