ts current incarnation - so I consider it to be
accurate, at least in that respect.
Patrick
myList - everything you could possibly want (to buy)
-Original Message-
From: Gavin Towey [mailto:gto...@ffn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:52 PM
To: Patrick Thompson; mysql@lists.mysql.c
Sorry, that should be 200MB not 20MB (still doesn't seem like much to me)
Patrick
myList - everything you could possibly want (to buy)
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Thompson
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 5:24 PM
To: 'Gavin Towey'; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: RE: m
'0'
'innodb_mirrored_log_groups', '1'
'innodb_open_files', '300'
'innodb_rollback_on_timeout', 'OFF'
'innodb_stats_on_metadata', 'ON'
'innodb_support_xa', 'ON'
'innodb_sync_spin_loops&#
list.com/> - everything you could possibly want (to buy)
From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:53 PM
To: Patrick Thompson; gto...@ffn.com; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: [SPAM] RE: mySql versus Sql Server performance
Importance: Low
Patrick-
you'll w
LT CHARSET=latin1;
This is just the retrieve side - which seems to be around 1.5 times slower than
the equivalent Sql Server numbers.
The update is much slower - 3 to 5 times slower depending on the record size.
It makes sense to me to focus on the retrieve, maybe the update is just a
reflecti
list.com/> - everything you could possibly want (to buy)
From: vegiv...@gmail.com [mailto:vegiv...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Johan De
Meersman
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 9:55 AM
To: Patrick Thompson
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: mySql versus Sql Server performance
I merely skimmed it, but y
I am running an open source project that provides an abstraction layer over a
number of different stores. I am puzzled by performance numbers I am seeing
between mysql and sql server - a brief discussion is available here
http://cipl.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Data%20Provider%20Comparison
The
