I've fairly extensively (although not necessarily scientifically) tested
SATA 150 vs. SCSI U320 and find that if you're doing a lot of random reads
and writes (such as with a database server), SCSI provides nearly 5x the
performance as SATA so, for us, it's well worth the additional expense.
It
[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]','O1',0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0)
Any insight into this problem would be appreciated. I k
