auto_increment fields get mangled in some cases when doing an alter table

2002-04-15 Thread Tani Hosokawa
* from blah; ++---+---+ | id | stuff | morestuff | ++---+---+ | 2 | blah | 0 | ++---+---+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) -- tani hosokawa river styx internet - Before posting

timezones aren't being properly handled

2002-03-05 Thread Tani Hosokawa
variables' even though the system timezone is set to EST. This bug is known to affect Redhat 7.2 and Redhat 7.1. -- tani hosokawa river styx internet - Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php

broken error log message

2001-07-09 Thread Tani Hosokawa
: `xx' (Got error %d from table handler) -- tani hosokawa river styx internet - Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request

replication involving now() is sketchy if the two server clocks differ.

2001-05-23 Thread Tani Hosokawa
or may not have the same kind of data. Replicated data should not use now() but should instead have the value calculated by now(). Fix: Submitter-Id: submitter ID Originator: Organization: tani hosokawa river styx internet MySQL support: email support Synopsis: now() shouldn't

the ORDER BY bug fix in 3.23.35

2001-03-15 Thread Tani Hosokawa
According to the changelog, there's a bug in ORDER BY that was recently introduced but fixed in 3.23.35. 3.23.34 fixed a bug in bidirectional replication though, so I'm wondering what the specifics of the bugs were, since I want to do bidirectional replication, but don't want a serious ORDER BY