On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:04:27AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I've replicated this problem on 3 different machines, and
> on 3.23.33 and 3.23.32. I had been using BDB tables for a
> couple weeks now in testing, without a hitch until the above
> query starting being used. I also tried to
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:35:06PM -0800, William R. Mussatto wrote:
> Your reply triggered a question?
>
> If you are on a win32 box and using the binary builds, what is the
> proceure for getting these patchs? Last time I checked the site is was
> still showing 3.23.33 as the current release
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:33:46PM +0200, Thimble Smith wrote:
> I can repeat this problem; I'm looking into it and we'll hopefully
> have a patch for it shortly.
Well, the problem is simply that max_allowed_packet needs to
be increased. Check the manual entry.
http://mysql.ton
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 05:45:24PM +0800, Huang-Ming wrote:
> to avoid further table corruption of my production database, i
> created ebody into the MySQL-accompanying "test" database and
> did the blob.pl test. the fault is still thereMySQL has
> just gone away with the wind
I can repea
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:48:44PM +, Greg Cope wrote:
>
> But does the conspiricy not continue ?
Yes, I suppose it does. I guess my secret spy status as enemy
of the state is now out in the open, plain as day.
> Do you not need to patch aclocal.m4 as this contains a referance to
> 3.2.3
> >Description:
> I just downloaded MySQL 3.23.31 and the "patched version" of
> Berkeley DB 3.2.3h from the www.mysql.com site. I ran configure
> with the option to enable the Berkeley DB, but it fails, telling
> me I don't have the proper version of the DB. Here are the
