> "M. A. Alves" wrote:
>
> > I think the problem is in your query expression.
you're absolutely right here
> I have reformulated your
> > original query using my style and that consistently results in 4 rows
> > which I think is what you wanted.
> >
> > Original_Query : String :=
> >"se
"M. A. Alves" wrote:
> I think the problem is in your query expression. I have reformulated your
> original query using my style and that consistently results in 4 rows
> which I think is what you wanted.
>
> Original_Query : String :=
>"select distinct Exhibition.InternalNumber,Exhibiti
"M. A. Alves" wrote:
> My testing returns 16 rows in both ways (program using API vs. mysql
> monitor). I have copied verbatim the query string from your C code (it
> was the "query" constant right?)
>
> I think this contrasts with your results no?
>
yes
when I typed in the same query in mys
Hi ppl!
I have a table with datetime type column in it.
when I make request "select * from my_table order by my_datetime"
I get the normal sort i.e. first the oldest dates but I want to get
reverse sort to have most recent dates to be the first.
How can I do this?
Thanks for any help :0)
Al
hi ppl!
I have two consequent queries
"select @g1=user from user_space where connects>10"
and
"select connect_time from connects where user=@g1"
To prevent misunderstanding I say that I don't want to use joining as in
my case tis very slow operation.
My question is:
when I proceed these two
Hi Sinisa!
Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
>
> Then it is very much possible that a table from which you have done
> SELECT is corrupted. Check it out.
>
Yes it was.
I used myisamchk -o first
and myisamchk -r next - it repaired indexes as well
but the result was the same :0(
Any other idea?
Maybe
