Re: [ot] harsh mail rejection

2001-12-06 Thread Sasha Pachev
On Thursday 06 December 2001 03:50 am, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > Because it's not yet perfect. ?Perhaps someone at MySQL.com and update > the filters a bit. ?Sasha, maybe? It is important to understand that no bot could ever get it right in 100% of the cases regardless of how sophisticated the rul

Re: [ot] harsh mail rejection

2001-12-06 Thread Keith C. Ivey
On 6 Dec 2001, at 9:08, Chris Withers wrote: > > database,sql,query,table > > Why does this list not include SELECT and INSERT?! Worse, why do we have to put up with the filtering at all when it's not doing its job? The Portuguese spam got through yesterday, but legitimate messages are block

Re: [ot] harsh mail rejection

2001-12-06 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:08:41AM +, Chris Withers wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Your message cannot be posted because it appears to be either spam or > > simply off topic to our filter. To bypass the filter you must include > > one of the following words in your message: > > >

[ot] harsh mail rejection

2001-12-06 Thread Chris Withers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Your message cannot be posted because it appears to be either spam or > simply off topic to our filter. To bypass the filter you must include > one of the following words in your message: > > database,sql,query,table Why does this list not include SELECT and INSERT?