Re: 4.1 questions: subqueries which use dual

2002-12-24 Thread Mark Matthews
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Clarke wrote: Dan, According to http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/News-4.1.0.html "SELECT ... FROM DUAL is an alias for SELECT (To be compatible with some other databases)." Your example does work however. mysql> select * from ( sele

Re: 4.1 questions: subqueries which use dual

2002-12-24 Thread Richard Clarke
set (0.00 sec) Richard. - Original Message - From: "Dan Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Richard Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Victoria Reznichenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "MySQL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 24,

Re: 4.1 questions: subqueries which use dual

2002-12-24 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Dec 24), Richard Clarke said: > Victoria, > I pulled that latest updates to the 4.1 tree to make sure I had the most > recent version and I still have the same problem. Here is a log of my > actions. > > # cd /usr/local/mysql-4.1 > mysql-4.1 # bin/mysql --defaults-file=etc

Re: 4.1 questions: subqueries which use dual

2002-12-24 Thread Richard Clarke
; To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 3:55 PM Subject: re: 4.1 questions: subqueries which use dual > On Sunday 22 December 2002 08:06, wrote: > > Mysql, > > Selecting from `dual` with a simple query works fine, > > > > mysql> sel

re: 4.1 questions: subqueries which use dual

2002-12-24 Thread Victoria Reznichenko
On Sunday 22 December 2002 08:06, wrote: > Mysql, > Selecting from `dual` with a simple query works fine, > > mysql> select 1 x from dual; > +---+ > > | x | > > +---+ > > | 1 | > > +---+ > > but within a derived table, > > mysql> select * from (select 1 x from dual) s; > ERROR 1146: Table 'tes

4.1 questions: subqueries which use dual

2002-12-21 Thread ric
Mysql, Selecting from `dual` with a simple query works fine, mysql> select 1 x from dual; +---+ | x | +---+ | 1 | +---+ but within a derived table, mysql> select * from (select 1 x from dual) s; ERROR 1146: Table 'test.dual' doesn't exist Is this an oversight or is it purposefully so? Than