You should probably reply to the correct email - according to your email
body, it appears that it was me who made the claim that there was a mysql
bug when I was simply replying to the person who actually did make the
claim.
jason
> On 09 Sep 2001 17:23:39 +1000, Jason Brooke wrote:
> > > To Wh
On 09 Sep 2001 17:23:39 +1000, Jason Brooke wrote:
> > To Whom it may concern,
> >
> > I've noticed a bug with the Billionium. Now that we have hit 1 Billion
> > seconds since the beginning of the Epoch mysql will NOT work properly with
This is NOT MySQL bug. I posted separate message with neede
-
Von: Jason Brooke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 9. September 2001 09:24
An: Panos Kalos; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Billionium Bug
> To Whom it may concern,
>
> I've noticed a bug with the Billionium. Now that we have hit 1 Billion
> seconds since the beginning of
MAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Carl Troein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: Billionium Bug
Your message cannot be posted because it appears to be either spam or
simply off topic to our filter. To bypass the filter you must include
one of the following words in your
> To Whom it may concern,
>
> I've noticed a bug with the Billionium. Now that we have hit 1 Billion
> seconds since the beginning of the Epoch mysql will NOT work properly with
a
> MIN clause involving seconds before the Billionium.
>
> To clarify, I have a script that keeps track of the seconds
To Whom it may concern,
I've noticed a bug with the Billionium. Now that we have hit 1 Billion
seconds since the beginning of the Epoch mysql will NOT work properly with a
MIN clause involving seconds before the Billionium.
To clarify, I have a script that keeps track of the
