Re: Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT

2002-07-12 Thread Steve Hay
Mark Matthews wrote: > Steve Hay wrote: > | I've tried the same myself on MyISAM tables as well now, and I also > | found that there is no problem - it only seems to happen using BDB > tables. > | > | However, I need to use BDB tables rather than MyISAM to get transaction > | support, which is r

Re: Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT

2002-07-12 Thread Steve Hay
Victoria Reznichenko wrote: >Steve, >Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 11:12:48 AM, you wrote: > >SH> The bug can be reproduced as follows: > >SH> Create the following simple database containing just one BDB table: > >SH> CREATE DATABASE test; > >SH> CREATE TABLE foo ( >SH>id INT NOT NULL

Re: Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT

2002-07-12 Thread Victoria Reznichenko
Steve, Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 11:12:48 AM, you wrote: SH> Continuing my troubles with AUTO_INCREMENT (which nobody has yet SH> responded to), I've now ruled the Perl DBI out of the equation and SH> reproduced the same problem using the "mysql.exe" command-line tool. SH> Hopefully somebody w

Re: Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT

2002-07-10 Thread Mark Matthews
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Hay wrote: | Thomas Spahni wrote: | |> Steve, |> |> I tried your example on MyIsam tables; no problems with auto_increment at |> all, except for a few |> |> ERROR 1040: Too many connections |> |> when 100 scripts are inserting concurrently at fu

Re: Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT

2002-07-10 Thread Thomas Spahni
e on MyIsam tables; no problems with auto_increment at all, except for a few ERROR 1040: Too many connections when 100 scripts are inserting concurrently at full speed. Thomas > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Steve Hay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > &g

Re: Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT

2002-07-10 Thread Steve Hay
Thomas Spahni wrote: >Steve, > >I tried your example on MyIsam tables; no problems with auto_increment at >all, except for a few > >ERROR 1040: Too many connections > >when 100 scripts are inserting concurrently at full speed. > >Thomas > I've tried the same myself on MyISAM tables as well now, a

Re: Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT

2002-07-10 Thread Steve Hay
it doesn't always fall over after some particular number of iterations - it falls over at different, apparently random, times each time I try the test. - Steve >- Original Message - >From: "Steve Hay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT

2002-07-10 Thread Richard Fox
Can your INT id be overflowing, i.e. reaches the max value for int and starting at 1 again? Rich - Original Message - From: "Steve Hay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:12 AM Subject: Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT > Hi, &

Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT

2002-07-10 Thread Steve Hay
Hi, Continuing my troubles with AUTO_INCREMENT (which nobody has yet responded to), I've now ruled the Perl DBI out of the equation and reproduced the same problem using the "mysql.exe" command-line tool. Hopefully somebody will be tempted to help this time now that there is no Perl involved

Re: Caching Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT columns

2001-02-13 Thread Peter Skipworth
handle lastinsert_id parameter ? *slightly blank look* P On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Caching Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT columns > > Description: > When i use a table with an AUTO_INCREMENT c

Caching Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT columns

2001-02-13 Thread christoph . schemainda
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Caching Bug with AUTO_INCREMENT columns Description: When i use a table with an AUTO_INCREMENT column and insert Data in the Table with a NULL Value for the AUTO_INCREMENT column, AUTO_INCREMENT sets an new value