I actually did make the switch to mnemonics (as
suggested by Rhino) I've gone slightly beyond 2
letters though due to the fact that some of my labels
might be more then confusing. I've tried to stick with
3 letters on average. It does seem like a better way
to go.
Stuart
--- mos <[EMAIL PROTECTED
At 02:36 PM 8/25/2004, you wrote:
Or maybe just bad practice. Thought before I go any
further I'll ask.
I have a few static tables that list out "items" and
the primary key is an "assigned" ID. Meaning I did
not set auto-increment. As I add items I will add the
associated ID number.
Now to the tr
m: "Stuart Felenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:36 PM
> > Subject: Could this be dangerous :Values and Labels
> >
> >
> > > Or maybe just bad practice. Thought before I go
>
- Original Message -
From: "Stuart Felenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rhino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: Could this be dangerous :Values and Labels
> The other idea I had aside
IL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:36 PM
> Subject: Could this be dangerous :Values and Labels
>
>
> > Or maybe just bad practice. Thought before I go
> any
> > further I'll ask.
> >
> > I have a f
can type in.
Thanks all
Stuart
--- Rhino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Stuart Felenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:36 PM
> Subject: Could this be
- Original Message -
From: "Stuart Felenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:36 PM
Subject: Could this be dangerous :Values and Labels
> Or maybe just bad practice. Thought before I go any
> further I
Or maybe just bad practice. Thought before I go any
further I'll ask.
I have a few static tables that list out "items" and
the primary key is an "assigned" ID. Meaning I did
not set auto-increment. As I add items I will add the
associated ID number.
Now to the transactional tables. While the
