Hello Jeremy,
Friday, March 29, 2002, 3:10:35 AM, you wrote:
>> Also a good thing with DRBD you will not have to store and track
>> replication log files and the setup will not require to take MySQL
>> down to copy the snapshot of database.
JZ> Why would you need to take down MySQL for a back
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 09:37:47AM +0300, Peter Zaitsev wrote:
> Also a good thing with DRBD you will not have to store and track
> replication log files and the setup will not require to take MySQL
> down to copy the snapshot of database.
Why would you need to take down MySQL for a backup (assu
Hello Jens,
Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 2:43:22 PM, you wrote:
We have tried to use DRBD with MySQL/EXT3/NFS and some other
applications. Generally it works rather good, showing rather nice
performance.
The only problem we had was problem with EXT3 corruption, which was in earlier
(2-3 months)
Hi,
has anyone used DRDB (http://www.linbit.com/) instead of the standard MySQL
replication?
DRDB implements a virtual disk mirrored across a local disk and a disk in a
remote stand-by server.
On first thought, it adds some complexity to setup, but it can also
replicate information not written to
