Design feature or bug

2003-01-14 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
I have a 3.23.53 server that is a slave of another 3.25.52 server. Master has 2 databases on it. On the slave only only one of the databases is replicated. If I reference the table database that is not on the slave during an insert or something on the server it crashes the slave! Shouldn't the

Re: Design feature or bug

2003-01-14 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:43:27PM -0800, Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net wrote: I have a 3.23.53 server that is a slave of another 3.25.52 server. Master has 2 databases on it. On the slave only only one of the databases is replicated. If I reference the table database that is not on the

RE: Design feature or bug

2003-01-14 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
-Original Message- From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:00 PM To: Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Design feature or bug On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:43:27PM -0800, Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net

Re: Design feature or bug

2003-01-14 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:41:53PM -0800, Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net wrote: I stand corrected. In a production environment a stopped server is as good as crashed. Ah, good. I know why things work they way they do, but it would be nice to have an option to change the replication

RE: Design feature or bug

2003-01-14 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
, January 14, 2003 6:18 PM To: Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Design feature or bug On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:41:53PM -0800, Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net wrote: I stand corrected. In a production environment a stopped server