d this
attention to detail with Oracle, but then Oracle costs a little more.
- Original Message -
From: "mos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: FW: MySQL patches from Google
This sounds a lot like what I'm attemptin
: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: FW: MySQL patches from Google
Kevin Spencer wrote:
> On 4/26/07, Mike OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I read the Google blog post regarding these patches. They admit using
>> MySQL for some internal data storage needs but not in the gen
Kevin Spencer wrote:
On 4/26/07, Mike OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read the Google blog post regarding these patches. They admit using
MySQL for some internal data storage needs but not in the general search
system.
Still, that leaves many other applications. Groups, gmail, reader,
news e
This sounds a lot like what I'm attempting. I tried a proprietary database
and got around 30k queries/second, compared to MySQL's of only 1-1.5k
queries /second. I'm torn between using the Windows proprietary database
(still has some minor buggy parts) on each webserver or going with MySQL
5.
On 4/26/07, Mike OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read the Google blog post regarding these patches. They admit using
MySQL for some internal data storage needs but not in the general search
system.
Still, that leaves many other applications. Groups, gmail, reader,
news et al...
--
Kevin.
--
O'Krongli
Acorg Inc
- Original Message -
From: "David T. Ashley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: April 25, 2007 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: FW: MySQL patches from Google
> On 4/25/07, mos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > At 02:36 PM 4/25/2007, you wrot
On 4/25/07, mos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 02:36 PM 4/25/2007, you wrote:
>On 4/25/07, Daevid Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>A co-worker sent this to me, thought I'd pass it along here. We do tons
of
>>failover/replication and would be eager to see mySQL implment the Google
>>patches
At 02:36 PM 4/25/2007, you wrote:
On 4/25/07, Daevid Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A co-worker sent this to me, thought I'd pass it along here. We do tons of
failover/replication and would be eager to see mySQL implment the Google
patches in the stock distribution. If anyone needs mission
On 4/25/07, Daevid Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A co-worker sent this to me, thought I'd pass it along here. We do tons of
failover/replication and would be eager to see mySQL implment the Google
patches in the stock distribution. If anyone needs mission critical,
scaleable, and failover c
A co-worker sent this to me, thought I'd pass it along here. We do tons of
failover/replication and would be eager to see mySQL implment the Google
patches in the stock distribution. If anyone needs mission critical,
scaleable, and failover clusters, it's Google -- so I have every confidence
their
10 matches
Mail list logo
