Ugh, that seems quite right. Now, why did they do that?
It was added for compatibility.
A separate specification is less convenient, and also less transparent.
Please click "affects me" on http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=47771
- Morgan
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: ht
2014/01/06 14:24 -0500, Morgan Tocker
You might be hitting:
"Important
The inline REFERENCES specifications where the references are defined as part
of the column specification are silently ignored. MySQL only accepts REFERENCES
clauses defined as part of a separate FOREIGN KEY specifi
Am 06.01.2014 18:21, schrieb h...@tbbs.net:
> Are INNODB foreign-key references ignored in 5.6?
why should they?
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 1/6/2014, 12:21 PM, h...@tbbs.net wrote:
Are INNODB foreign-key references ignored in 5.6?
You might be hitting:
"Important
The inline REFERENCES specifications where the references are defined as
part of the column specification are silently ignored. MySQL only
accepts REFERENCES clauses
Are INNODB foreign-key references ignored in 5.6?
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
sday, November 25, 2004 12:03 PM
Subject: enrror in foreign key reference
Hello i'd like to converte this DDL for mysql
ALTER TABLE MYTABLE_ROLE
ADD ( FOREIGN KEY (LOGIN)
REFERENCES MYTABLE_USER ) ;
i wrote
ALTER TABLE MYTABLE_ROLE
ADD
Is there an index on the column in the table referenced?
F.Balicchia wrote:
Hello i'd like to converte this DDL for mysql
ALTER TABLE MYTABLE_ROLE
ADD ( FOREIGN KEY (LOGIN)
REFERENCES MYTABLE_USER ) ;
i wrote
ALTER TABLE MYTABLE_ROLE
ADD FOREIGN
Hello i'd like to converte this DDL for mysql
ALTER TABLE MYTABLE_ROLE
ADD ( FOREIGN KEY (LOGIN)
REFERENCES MYTABLE_USER ) ;
i wrote
ALTER TABLE MYTABLE_ROLE
ADD FOREIGN KEY (LOGIN) REFERENCES MYTABLE_USER ;
by it return me this error.
#1005
Sven
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 10. Februar 2004 15:29
> To: Heikki Tuuri
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Foreign Key Reference to a VARCHAR
>
> Heikki Tuuri wrote:
> >
> > I guess that 4
Heikki Tuuri wrote:
I guess that 4-byte UTF8 characters are not needed. You can code 16 million
characters with 3 bytes.
Yes. But is that also the case if you use the UTF-8 encoding
scheme, or can that scheme code less characters with 3 bytes?
http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1064324988&order=-1&count=1
languages on Earth.
Thank you,
Heikki
- Alkuperäinen viesti -
Lähettäjä: "Sven Woltmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lähetetty: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:53 PM
Aihe: RE: Foreign Key Reference
ks again,
Sven
> -Original Message-
> From: Heikki Tuuri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 10. Februar 2004 14:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Foreign Key Reference to a VARCHAR
>
> Sven,
>
> are you using the UTF8 charset? Then a single chara
anything on this.
I was trying for a couple of hours now to create a foreign key reference on
a varchar field:
CREATE TABLE users
(
loginVARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
password VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
email_addressVARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
-
Hi,
I hope this is not a well known problem since I just signed up to this list. But I
checked the February archive and couldn't find anything on this.
I was trying for a couple of hours now to create a foreign key reference on a varchar
field:
CREATE TABLE users
(
14 matches
Mail list logo
