Re: General DB Design Question - How to avoid redundancy in table relationships

2006-02-14 Thread Bob Gailer
Scott Klarenbach wrote: These are the tables in question: RFQ (Request for Quote) Part Inventory Inventory items ALWAYS have a partID. RFQ items ALWAYS have a partID. However, sometimes, RFQ items have an inventoryID as well. Now, we have a redundancy problem. Because, in those instances w

Re: General DB Design Question - How to avoid redundancy in table relationships

2006-02-13 Thread Peter Brawley
Scott, >I'm sure this type of problem is run up against all the time, and I'm >wondering what the best practice methodology is from experienced DBA's. It looks like the kind of problem database schemas are meant to _avoid_. >From your description it seems you have ...   part (     partID PRIM

General DB Design Question - How to avoid redundancy in table relationships

2006-02-13 Thread Scott Klarenbach
These are the tables in question: RFQ (Request for Quote) Part Inventory Inventory items ALWAYS have a partID. RFQ items ALWAYS have a partID. However, sometimes, RFQ items have an inventoryID as well. Now, we have a redundancy problem. Because, in those instances when the RFQ has an invento