Re: General Query time question

2002-01-08 Thread Bogdan Stancescu
I'm just guessing here, but I suppose most of the char(1) fields are y/n fields. If that's the case you should consider using a single BIGINT and flag those bits instead. That would considerably reduce the size of the table on one hand and I guess it should improve things speed-wise as well. Obvi

Re: General Query time question

2002-01-08 Thread Carl Troein
Greer, Darren (MED) writes: > If I move the status to another table, and then wanted to get a count of > everyone who is of status 'A', how would that be any quicker? Would I > join the tables? Communication error - reattempting. I meant that if you want to get the count of the number of 'A's

Re: General Query time question

2002-01-08 Thread Bogdan Stancescu
My suggestion (using a bigint and flagging the bits instead of using 40 char(1) fields) is only valid if you don't use any of those fields in WHERE clauses in SELECT's. Not that you wouldn't be able to retrieve the entries based on the respective field, but I don't think it would be indeed faster

RE: General Query time question

2002-01-08 Thread Greer, Darren (MED)
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: General Query time question I didn't think/read far enough. One more attempt is due. > > Correction on the query: SELECT count(*) as count FR > OM userdata WHERE > > status = 'A'; I didn't see that it was on that column you had an index

Re: General Query time question

2002-01-08 Thread Carl Troein
I didn't think/read far enough. One more attempt is due. > > Correction on the query: SELECT count(*) as count FR > OM userdata WHERE > > status = 'A'; I didn't see that it was on that column you had an index, so forget I said 'of course'. Have you used EXPLAIN to figure out if the index is act

RE: General Query time question

2002-01-08 Thread Greer, Darren (MED)
ogdan Stancescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:37 AM To: Greer, Darren (MED) Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: General Query time question I'm just guessing here, but I suppose most of the char(1) fields are y/n fields. If that's the case yo

Re: General Query time question

2002-01-08 Thread Carl Troein
Greer, Darren (MED) writes: > Correction on the query: SELECT count(*) as count FR OM userdata WHERE > status = 'A'; Ah. That does make a difference. MySQL is of course forced to go through all of your data, counting the number of rows with status 'A'. I don't believe an index would do you much

RE: General Query time question

2002-01-08 Thread Greer, Darren (MED)
Correction on the query: SELECT count(*) as count FROM userdata WHERE status = 'A'; Sorry. -Original Message- From: Greer, Darren (MED) Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:20 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: General Query time question Hello all. I have a data

General Query time question

2002-01-08 Thread Greer, Darren (MED)
Hello all. I have a database which is around 10million rows. The structure is as follows: id int(11) NOT NULL- Auto Increment address char(90) NOT NULL status char(2) NOT NULL country char(2) state char(2) areacode char(3) ...about 40 char(1) fields. I have an unique index on address,