Peter J Milanese said:
>
> The lack of error checking on the server side means better
> performance in my opinion.
Does it? Or does client side error checking use server resources as well?
Lets suppose that we want to validate a new message that is entered
into a thread on a messageboard. Then we
e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/20/2004 01:20 PM
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Donny Simonton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 'Stormblade'
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:RE: Gripe with MySQL
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:33:18 -0400, Peter J Milanese wrote:
> Just something I noticed missing here
>
>
> The lack of error checking on the server side means better
> performance in my opinion.
No doubt.
> When you're throwing
> a couple thousand hits per second at it, this is visible. I woul
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McTernan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > if you don't have error checking in yourself, that's your problem
> > not mysql's problem.
>
> True, but still doesn't help when someone inexperienced with
> MySQL makes a
> mistake and buggers the database...
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Donny Simonton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 'Stormblade'
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:RE: Gripe with MySQL
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:57:08 +0100, Michael McTernan wrote:
> Donny,
--- Original Message ---
From: "Stormblade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Donny Simonton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 12:59:58 -0400
Subject: RE: Gripe with MySQL
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:37:12 -0500, Donny Simonton wrote:
> Everybody should remembe
not just
one global error checking type.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Donny Simonton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 20 April 2004 17:37
>> To: 'Michael McTernan'; 'Stormblade'
>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTE
database... again. I don't see why you object to
making things easier to use, even if it is only activated by a -n00b option
in mysql_safe.
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Donny Simonton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 April 2004 17:37
> To: 'Mi
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:25:58 -0500, Peter Brawley wrote:
>>If you are going to have a database that will be centralized for the
> company
>>and will have many different clients accessing it, I would tell them not to
> use
>>MySQL.
>
> OK, though 5.0 makes it possible to write stored procs that pr
OTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:04 AM
> To: Stormblade
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Gripe with MySQL
>
> Hi,
>
> ENUM columns can also trip you up if you insert a value outside of the
> ENUM;
> an empty string is inserted instead. This is docu
keep database-protecting validation where it
belongs--on the server.
PB
- Original Message -
From: Stormblade
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: Gripe with MySQL
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:48:11 +0200 (CEST), Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> Stormbl
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stormblade
> Sent: 20 April 2004 01:42
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Gripe with MySQL
>
>
> Ok. Love MySQL and I will be using it for my personal use and recommending
> it to clients as a lower
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:48:11 +0200 (CEST), Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> Stormblade said:
>> Ok. Love MySQL and I will be using it for my personal use and
>> recommending it to clients as a lower cost alternative. I've only
>> been using it for a very short time but there one major gripe I have
>> wi
Stormblade said:
> Ok. Love MySQL and I will be using it for my personal use and
> recommending it to clients as a lower cost alternative. I've only
> been using it for a very short time but there one major gripe I have
> with it and I believe it's just a design thing.
>
> MySQL seems to put the bu
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 20:17:38 -0700 (PDT), Marc Slemko wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Stormblade wrote:
>
>> Ok. Love MySQL and I will be using it for my personal use and recommending
>> it to clients as a lower cost alternative. I've only been using it for a
>> very short time but there one major
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Stormblade wrote:
> Ok. Love MySQL and I will be using it for my personal use and recommending
> it to clients as a lower cost alternative. I've only been using it for a
> very short time but there one major gripe I have with it and I believe it's
> just a design thing.
>
> My
Ok. Love MySQL and I will be using it for my personal use and recommending
it to clients as a lower cost alternative. I've only been using it for a
very short time but there one major gripe I have with it and I believe it's
just a design thing.
MySQL seems to put the burden of error checking and s
17 matches
Mail list logo
