mo...@fastmail.fm (mos) writes:
At 12:37 AM 6/25/2009, you wrote:
...
my.cnf based on my-huge.cnf, expanding key_buffer to 8G,
myisam_sort_buffer_size to 256M, and putting tmpdir on the fiber channel
disk.
You mean key_buffer_size don't you and not key_buffer? If you
are using
Subject
Re: Indexing dynamics in MySQL Community Edition 5.1.34
Mike,
I re-posted your Show Status to the group to see if anyone can
offer
a way to speed up the indexing for you.
BTW, you are adding ALL of the indexes to the table using ONE sql
statement
right? And not a separate
/i...@ibmus
06/27/09 09:48 AM
To
mos mo...@fastmail.fm
cc
mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject
Re: Indexing dynamics in MySQL Community Edition 5.1.34
Yes, all the indices are added in one ALTER TABLE statement. Thursday's
incarnation took about 1.5 hours, on a table created from about 8 GB
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Mike Spreitzermspre...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Today's instance finished shortly after I sent the email below. BTW, here
are some specifics on the table (which uses MyISAM). Thursday's instance
has 11 GB of data and 0.78 GB of index. Today's instance has 26 GB of
mo...@fastmail.fm
06/25/09 02:32 AM
To
mysql@lists.mysql.com
cc
Subject
Re: Indexing dynamics in MySQL Community Edition 5.1.34
At 12:37 AM 6/25/2009, you wrote:
Actually, my characterization of the current state is wrong. It appears
that one core is completely busy, I suppose MySQL
-Original Message-
From: Moon's Father [mailto:yueliangdao0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 4:12 AM
To: mos
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Indexing dynamics in MySQL Community Edition 5.1.34
Who can please tell me what is mean of The db storage is on fiber
channel
[mailto:jschwa...@the-infoshop.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 10:22 AM
To: 'Moon's Father'; 'mos'
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: RE: Indexing dynamics in MySQL Community Edition 5.1.34
-Original Message-
From: Moon's Father [mailto:yueliangdao0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26
At 12:37 AM 6/25/2009, you wrote:
Actually, my characterization of the current state is wrong. It appears
that one core is completely busy, I suppose MySQL does this indexing work
in a single thread. Is it reasonable for indexing to be CPU bound?
my.cnf based on my-huge.cnf, expanding
-Original Message-
From: Mike Spreitzer [mailto:mspre...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 1:38 AM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Indexing dynamics in MySQL Community Edition 5.1.34
Actually, my characterization of the current state is wrong. It appears
that one core
| 6952 |
| Uptime_since_flush_status | 6952 |
+---+---+
Thanks,
Mike Spreitzer
mos mo...@fastmail.fm
06/25/09 02:32 AM
To
mysql@lists.mysql.com
cc
Subject
Re: Indexing dynamics in MySQL Community Edition 5.1.34
At 12
Using MyISAM on a table loaded from 8GB of CSV, I am now adding some
indices. In a separate shell I monitor the progress, alternately with
`vmstat` and show full processlist. At first vmstat shows rapid
progress; an example is
# vmstat 5
procs ---memory-- ---swap--
To
mysql@lists.mysql.com
cc
Subject
Indexing dynamics in MySQL Community Edition 5.1.34
Using MyISAM on a table loaded from 8GB of CSV, I am now adding some
indices. In a separate shell I monitor the progress, alternately with
`vmstat` and show full processlist. At first vmstat shows
12 matches
Mail list logo
