Re: InnoDB and concurrent operations

2001-05-15 Thread Heikki Tuuri
Steve, At 09:48 AM 5/15/01 -0600, you wrote: >Heikki Tuuri wrote: >> >> Steve, >> >> your observations suggest that it is MySQL which is holding some >> semaphore while it is aborting a connection (which in your case >> required a big rollback). The operating system seems to be innocent. >> >

Re: InnoDB and concurrent operations

2001-05-15 Thread Heikki Tuuri
Steve, your observations suggest that it is MySQL which is holding some semaphore while it is aborting a connection (which in your case required a big rollback). The operating system seems to be innocent. On Windows NT I have seen that disk operations will freeze the computer almost totally. Lin

Re: InnoDB and concurrent operations

2001-05-14 Thread Steve Ruby
Heikki Tuuri wrote: > > Steve, > > on what operating system you are running? > linux, intel 2.2.12 > Was the rollback (and the table load) disk bound? Did you configure much > memory to the InnoDB buffer pool? > I would say the rollback was processor bound, the machine was running with almos

InnoDB and concurrent operations

2001-05-14 Thread Steve Ruby
There seem to be some operations that cannot be performed on the server whie InnoDB is doing something. For example I inserted about 200,000 rows in to a table from a file (mysql database < file) the file starts with begin; and contains many inserts, I cancelled (ctrl-c) in the middle of the o