Re: Fw: InnoDB crash repeated under 3.23.51...

2002-05-29 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:06:19PM +0300, Heikki Tuuri wrote: > Jeremy, > > it looks like this crash can happen if you use MySQL 'user level locks' > which are kind of semaphores. In that case MySQL will write a binlog entry > even after THD::cleanup where the transaction handle is freed. > > >F

Fw: InnoDB crash repeated under 3.23.51...

2002-05-29 Thread Heikki Tuuri
; Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:16 PM Subject: Re: InnoDB crash repeated under 3.23.51... > Jeremy, > > I think this happens because the InnoDB transaction handle has already been > freed in end_thread when MySQL still writes one log item for the connection. > Please test the followin

Re: InnoDB crash repeated under 3.23.51...

2002-05-29 Thread Heikki Tuuri
obase_tid)); thd->transaction.all.innobase_tid = NULL; } return(0); } - Original Message - From: "Jeremy Zawodny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 20

Re: InnoDB crash repeated under 3.23.51...

2002-05-29 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:13:49AM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > Heikki, > > After a good 6-8 hours of runnning, the server just restarted itself > (running the most recent build from the 3.23.xx tree, as you > suggested). Just for the record, it happened again. So it's reproducable to a dregr

InnoDB crash repeated under 3.23.51...

2002-05-28 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
Heikki, After a good 6-8 hours of runnning, the server just restarted itself (running the most recent build from the 3.23.xx tree, as you suggested). I got this message: InnoDB: Assertion failure in thread 42527756 in file ha_innobase.cc line 316 InnoDB: We intentionally generate a memory trap.