Re: Linux vs. Windows?

Brian Dunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have a look here, but use that OS which you know better: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/windows-vs-unix.html Same machine, any performance difference? -- For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita This

Linux vs. Windows?

Same machine, any performance difference? -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Linux vs. Windows?

Same machine, any performance difference? creakcreakcreak - the sound of a rusty old can of worms being opened...;) -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Linux vs. Windows?

[snip] Same machine, any performance difference? [/snip] Yes. Linux will consistently outperform Windows in many areas. -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Linux vs. Windows?

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Jay Blanchard wrote: Yes. Linux will consistently outperform Windows in many areas. Except Dilbert's boss's approval queue. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason

Re: Linux vs. Windows?

Il giorno 12/ago/05, alle ore 16:46, Brian Dunning ha scritto: Same machine, any performance difference? go to http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.mysql.com/information/ benchmark-results/result-mysql-platform-relative.html anyway the difference isn't only in performance what

Re: Linux vs. Windows?

this aren't wise. - Original Message - From: Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brian Dunning [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mysql@lists.mysql.com Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 7:55 AM Subject: RE: Linux vs. Windows? [snip] Same machine, any performance difference? [/snip] Yes. Linux will consistently

RE: Linux vs. Windows?

On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 09:55 -0500, Jay Blanchard wrote: [snip] Same machine, any performance difference? [/snip] Yes. Linux will consistently outperform Windows in many areas. Except for those areas that it doesn't. -- Pat Adams Applications Programmer SYSCO Food Services of Dallas

RE: Linux vs. Windows?

[snip] On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 09:55 -0500, Jay Blanchard wrote: [snip] Same machine, any performance difference? [/snip] Yes. Linux will consistently outperform Windows in many areas. Except for those areas that it doesn't. [/snip] True. -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives:

RE: Linux vs. Windows?

[snip] I am willing to bet you I can write a more scalable higher performing socket server using NT I/O Completion Ports than you can write using Linux's epoll. It you're running a 32 cpu system, Windows will consistently outperform Linux in many areas. My point is, blanket statements like

Re: Linux vs. Windows?

On 8/12/05, Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] I am willing to bet you I can write a more scalable higher performing socket server using NT I/O Completion Ports than you can write using Linux's epoll. It you're running a 32 cpu system, Windows will consistently outperform

Re: Linux vs. Windows?

[snip] creakcreakcreak - the sound of a rusty old can of worms being opened...;) [/snip] Except when it's already open. -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Linux vs. Windows?

Like crashing, auto-rebooting, memory leaking, program cost, etc... :) Brian Duke Level(3) Communication ==-=-=-=-=--==--==¬ -Original Message- From: Pat Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 9:21 AM To: mysql@lists.mysql.com Subject: RE: Linux vs

RE: Linux vs. Windows?

On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 09:30 -0600, Duke, Brian wrote: Like crashing, auto-rebooting, memory leaking, program cost, etc... -Original Message- From: Pat Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 9:21 AM To: mysql@lists.mysql.com Subject: RE: Linux vs. Windows

Re: Linux vs. Windows?

* Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050812 07:32]: [snip] On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 09:55 -0500, Jay Blanchard wrote: [snip] Same machine, any performance difference? [/snip] Yes. Linux will consistently outperform Windows in many areas. Except for those areas that it doesn't. [/snip]

Re: Linux vs. Windows?

Please note that this answer is not meant to support one OS or another, but the information on that page is not useful. The information is seriously out of date. The comparison is on Windows NT not Server 2K3 or XP. The hardware is Pentium Pro 400 or AMD K6II-350 with old versions of

RE: Linux vs. Windows?

Pat Adams wrote: Even though Linux more or less acts like its big UNIX cousins, the nitty gritty details of system administration, security, and patching are much difference. Ah, not really. In the *nix world, I first encountered Linux, then HPUX, then AIX, then Linux again, then Solaris.

RE: Linux vs. Windows?

Folks, Go with what you know best. If you are a good Windows admin etc go with windows. If you are a good Linux/Unix admin go with Linux. What little performance gain from one or the other will be lost if you do not run a tight ship all around. Performance and stability goes way beyond what

Re: Linux vs. Windows?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]; mysql@lists.mysql.com Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 8:26 AM Subject: RE: Linux vs. Windows? [snip] I am willing to bet you I can write a more scalable higher performing socket server using NT I/O Completion Ports than you can write using Linux's epoll. It you're running a 32 cpu

Re: Linux vs. Windows?

I can't resist... neither Mac OS X! lol Dan T On Aug 12, 2005, at 8:46 AM, Brian Dunning wrote: Same machine, any performance difference? -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]