wendorf, pat writes:
> I'm not entirely familiar with how the daemon stores these values for the
> entire database, but I'm guessing it's done in memory. Is it not possible
> to allocate storage for these values in memory for each table that has been
> opened?(they'd be removed once the table is
Pat
-Original Message-
From: Sinisa Milivojevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:27 AM
To: wendorf, pat
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Lower Level Visibility
wendorf, pat writes:
> Is it possible to observe Handler_read_next and Handler_read_key on
wendorf, pat writes:
> Is it possible to observe Handler_read_next and Handler_read_key on a per
> table basis? If not, could this feature be added?
>
> I'm not subscribed to this list, please cc all replies back to this email
> address.
>
> - Pat Wendorf
>
>
Hi!
It could be possi
Is it possible to observe Handler_read_next and Handler_read_key on a per
table basis? If not, could this feature be added?
I'm not subscribed to this list, please cc all replies back to this email
address.
- Pat Wendorf
-
B
