Re: Major Performance Degradation after replacing Hard Drive

2008-07-21 Thread Phil
Thanks all for the suggestions. I *think* I've finally figured it out. At the end of the day I think it was because the new drives were formatted with ext3. I recreated them in ext2 and performance is back to where it was on those queries.. I hadn't realised that ext3 would give that much of a de

Re: Major Performance Degradation after replacing Hard Drive

2008-07-21 Thread Wm Mussatto
On Mon, July 21, 2008 09:14, Brent Baisley wrote: > Copying 5GB files shows you what kind of performance you would get for > working with say video, or anything with large contiguous files. > Database access tends to be random, so you want a drive with faster > random access, not streaming speed. T

Re: Major Performance Degradation after replacing Hard Drive

2008-07-21 Thread mos
At 11:14 AM 7/21/2008, you wrote: Copying 5GB files shows you what kind of performance you would get for working with say video, or anything with large contiguous files. Database access tends to be random, so you want a drive with faster random access, not streaming speed. Try copying thousands o

Re: Major Performance Degradation after replacing Hard Drive

2008-07-21 Thread Brent Baisley
Copying 5GB files shows you what kind of performance you would get for working with say video, or anything with large contiguous files. Database access tends to be random, so you want a drive with faster random access, not streaming speed. Try copying thousands of small files and compare the speeds

Re: Major Performance Degradation after replacing Hard Drive

2008-07-21 Thread Phil
Possibly.. top - 07:52:58 up 18:04, 3 users, load average: 4.98, 4.09, 3.20 Tasks: 165 total, 3 running, 162 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu0 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 100.0% ni, 0.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si Cpu1 : 0.0% us, 0.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 0.0% id, 96.3% wa, 0.7% hi, 2.7%

Re: Major Performance Degradation after replacing Hard Drive

2008-07-21 Thread Ananda Kumar
when you run this update, what is the IO WAIT from the top command. regards anandkl On 7/21/08, Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nothing else running and no queries go against that table, it's effectively > created just for this, so I would expect the table lock. > > Show (full) processlist

Re: Major Performance Degradation after replacing Hard Drive

2008-07-21 Thread Phil
Nothing else running and no queries go against that table, it's effectively created just for this, so I would expect the table lock. Show (full) processlist has nothing but this running.. Confirmed the faster disks by copying 5Gb files between two of the same type of disk (I installed two of them

Re: Major Performance Degradation after replacing Hard Drive

2008-07-21 Thread Ananda Kumar
Is there any other job running while the update is happening. Because, myisam does a table level lock. Please check the "show full processlist". Also run mysqladmin -uroot -pxxx status. This would write lock information into the machine.err log file. Check in this file also if there is any locking

Major Performance Degradation after replacing Hard Drive

2008-07-21 Thread Phil
Hi All, Given a fairly simple table as follows CREATE TABLE `common_userx2` ( `t_proj` char(6) default NULL, `t_id` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', `t_nick` varchar(50) character set latin1 collate latin1_bin NOT NULL default '', `t_country` varchar(50) NOT NULL default '', `t_cpid` varc