Re: Merge Tables and Replication

2008-04-10 Thread dpgirago
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> Does this sound about right? Anybody see any road hazards? If not, and >> this line of thinking is reasonable, should the DB with the older records >> also be replicated so that when a new old records table needs to be >> created, I don't have to repeat everythin

Re: Merge Tables and Replication

2008-04-09 Thread Raj Shekhar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Does this sound about right? Anybody see any road hazards? If not, and > this line of thinking is reasonable, should the DB with the older records > also be replicated so that when a new old records table needs to be > created, I don't have to repeat everything on th

Merge Tables and Replication

2008-04-08 Thread dpgirago
The recent thread about merge tables led me to explore using them with replication. I see bug reports for the 4.0.** series regarding replication and merge tables, and I've read the manual about merge table problems in the 5.0.** series ( we are using 5.0.22 ), but I'm curious if anyone has any