More anti-spam annoyance

2003-06-17 Thread Keith C. Ivey
It's not bad enough that we have subscribers with challenge-response systems misconfigured so that they respond to each message from the list. Now one of the list admins is apparently doing something similar. At present rates of growth, it will be interesting to see whether spam or anti-spam

Re: More anti-spam annoyance

2003-06-17 Thread Mark Matthews
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Keith C. Ivey wrote: It's not bad enough that we have subscribers with challenge-response systems misconfigured so that they respond to each message from the list. Now one of the list admins is apparently doing something similar. At present

Re: More anti-spam annoyance

2003-06-17 Thread Jim Winstead
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:52:27AM -0400, Keith C. Ivey wrote: It's not bad enough that we have subscribers with challenge-response systems misconfigured so that they respond to each message from the list. Now one of the list admins is apparently doing something similar. At present rates