Re: Multipart + IN comparison on the second part + JOIN does not use full index

2007-10-03 Thread Baron Schwartz
Daly - Original Message - From: "Rob Wultsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 1:30 AM Subject: Re: Multipart + IN comparison on the second part + JOIN does not use full index : It is way past bed time so excuse me if I am way off... : :

Re: Multipart + IN comparison on the second part + JOIN does not use full index

2007-10-03 Thread Eamon Daly
ginal Message - From: "Rob Wultsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 1:30 AM Subject: Re: Multipart + IN comparison on the second part + JOIN does not use full index : It is way past bed time so excuse me if I am way off... : : What is the order of

Re: Multipart + IN comparison on the second part + JOIN does not use full index

2007-10-02 Thread Rob Wultsch
It is way past bed time so excuse me if I am way off... What is the order of tables in the explain? What is shown as the select_type? On 10/2/07, Eamon Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, all. I couldn't find this mentioned in the docs or in > the archives, so I'd figure I'd ask. I have a t

Multipart + IN comparison on the second part + JOIN does not use full index

2007-10-02 Thread Eamon Daly
Hi, all. I couldn't find this mentioned in the docs or in the archives, so I'd figure I'd ask. I have a table with a multipart index on three columns. When querying the table alone using IN operators on any of the three columns, all parts of the index are used. However, if I do a JOIN with another