Folks,
> FreeBSD 5.x does a lot of things really well, and it can be very
> fast too, but there's no stable release of 5.x yet, and the 5.x
> code is clearly hampered speedwise by the presence of loads of
> debugging code. From the 5.x documentation:
>
> ---
> NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:20:46PM -0400, RV Tec wrote:
>
> Eric,
>
>
> > I am sure all FreeBSD users are sick and tired of saying this. USE
> > 4.10
> > Lots of people blindly follow version numbers but 5.x is a lot different
> > than 4.x in ways I don't yet feel comfortable with using on p
Err... I guess I owe Jeremy Zawodny an apology for mistyping his name. I
promise next time I won't type without reading.
His site is at http://jeremy.zawodny.com/. And I really recommend his
book "High Performance MySQL".
Sorry for the typo, Zawodny!
RV Tec
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For li
Eric,
> I am sure all FreeBSD users are sick and tired of saying this. USE
> 4.10
> Lots of people blindly follow version numbers but 5.x is a lot different
> than 4.x in ways I don't yet feel comfortable with using on production
> machines. Only one of those issues is with benchmark numbers
Hi,
I am sure all FreeBSD users are sick and tired of saying this. USE 4.10
Lots of people blindly follow version numbers but 5.x is a lot different than 4.x in
ways I don't yet feel comfortable with using on production machines. Only one of those
issues is with benchmark numbers, but that i
