Performance of Joining Tables From Different Storage Engines -- Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for heavily-indexed, read-mostly data

Thanks Mike for the information. Yes, Emmett mentioned the same thing in a private message, and it seems that MyISAM is exactly what I'm looking for: a heavily-indexed large table that will be also indexed for full-text search and built off-line -- no updates whatsoever. However, I will be

Re: Performance of Joining Tables From Different Storage Engines -- Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for heavily-indexed, read-mostly data

At 04:00 PM 12/21/2004, Homam S.A. wrote: Thanks Mike for the information. Yes, Emmett mentioned the same thing in a private message, and it seems that MyISAM is exactly what I'm looking for: a heavily-indexed large table that will be also indexed for full-text search and built off-line -- no

Re: Performance of Joining Tables From Different Storage Engines -- Re: MyISAM vs. InnoDB for heavily-indexed, read-mostly data

Thanks Mike. I think testing ultimately determines how efficient heterogeneous engine joins are. I just wanted to know if someone had issues with them in a heavy-load environment. --- mos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 04:00 PM 12/21/2004, Homam S.A. wrote: Thanks Mike for the information. Yes,