On Friday 15 January 2010 13:55:18 fsb wrote:
> the example you gave would work with a range constraint:
>
> WHERE `bar_id` > 0 AND `bar_id` < 63
>
> but i guess this is not a general solution.
>
> i've done exactly this kind of select using an IN constraint very often.
> i've not had any trou
the example you gave would work with a range constraint:
WHERE `bar_id` > 0 AND `bar_id` < 63
but i guess this is not a general solution.
i've done exactly this kind of select using an IN constraint very often.
i've not had any trouble with lists of a few hundred so long as i have the
necessar
I'm facing a refactor of some slow code that engages the DB pretty heavily.
We're looking for a way to load arbitrary sets of rows from a table using an
indexed column of decently high cardinality, and I'm not sure if IN() is a
good way to do it or not.
Basically, we're looking at this:
CRE
