Re: Performance of different length/size datatypes

2006-10-31 Thread Paul McCullagh
Message - From: Chris W. Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mysql@lists.mysql.com Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 10:35 PM Subject: Performance of different length/size datatypes Hello, Originally I had this long explanation of what I'm doing and why I'm asking this question but I thought I'd

Re: Performance of different length/size datatypes

2006-10-30 Thread Visolve DB Team
, October 27, 2006 10:35 PM Subject: Performance of different length/size datatypes Hello, Originally I had this long explanation of what I'm doing and why I'm asking this question but I thought I'd just cut to the chase and ask... For a db that doesn't get a lot queries is there much

Performance of different length/size datatypes

2006-10-27 Thread Chris W. Parker
Hello, Originally I had this long explanation of what I'm doing and why I'm asking this question but I thought I'd just cut to the chase and ask... For a db that doesn't get a lot queries is there much of a performance difference between BLOB and VARCHAR(255)? Thanks, Chris. -- MySQL General

Re: Performance of different length/size datatypes

2006-10-27 Thread Dan Buettner
Chris, it should be noted that a BLOB is binary data, not character data like VARCHAR. BLOBs will act differently in terms of case-sensitivity for example. The TEXT data type might be more what you're looking for. See http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/blob.html for some more info on BLOB