Yes, I increased this to 512M, as suggested in another answer, and the
perfomance improved dramatically. Thanks for the tip.
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 07:25:17AM -0500, Chris Stoughton wrote:
>
>
>>Joseph,
>>
>>Thanks for the quick answer.
>>
>>Very nice to know that add
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 07:25:17AM -0500, Chris Stoughton wrote:
> Joseph,
>
> Thanks for the quick answer.
>
> Very nice to know that adding an index forces a rebuild of all indices!
> (Side note -- I was going to configure the database with a minimal set
> of indices, and then watch to see
Joseph,
Thanks for the quick answer.
Very nice to know that adding an index forces a rebuild of all indices!
(Side note -- I was going to configure the database with a minimal set
of indices, and then watch to see how people use the database, and then
add indices on popular columns.)
I did
