Re: Possible bug in 3.23.32 or later

2001-04-20 Thread tyler
ng > a negative value in an autoincrement field is a Bad Thing > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 6:14 AM > Subject: Possible bug in 3.23.32 or later > > >>> Description:

Re: Possible bug in 3.23.32 or later

2001-04-18 Thread Milo Stefani
As Far as I can remember it is explicitly said in the Manual that inserting a negative value in an autoincrement field is a Bad Thing - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 6:14 AM Subject: Possible bug in 3.23

Possible bug in 3.23.32 or later

2001-04-17 Thread duaneh
>Description: When i insert into a negative integer into primary key (id int) field, it works fine. However, the next insert i do without specifing the id explicitly and relying on mysql to generate the next number in the sequence (should be 1) will use the upper bound (